cool. thanks for the info
--
James Gosnell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ#1727569
http://premed.dhs.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Should I be conscerned about httpd defunct processes?
> yes, they take up resources from your system and don't give
> back. Also, some `crazy' ones may eat 99% of CPU power.
> In a normal setup you shouldn't have any of those.
>
That depends on the defunc-ness... If
Hi James!
On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, James Gosnell wrote:
> Should I be conscerned about httpd defunct processes?
yes, they take up resources from your system and don't give
back. Also, some `crazy' ones may eat 99% of CPU power.
In a normal setup you shouldn't have any of those.
-- teodor-perl-beginn
> "JG" == James Gosnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JG> Should I be conscerned about httpd defunct processes?
How long to they stick around? Are you talking about zombies or some
other "defunct"-ness?
They should go away after a few seconds, when the parent get a chance
to reap them, assum
> Should I be conscerned about httpd defunct processes?
Yes, you will find the answer in
http://perl.apache.org/guide/performance.html#Forking_and_Executing_Subprocess
__
Stas Bekman | JAm_pH--Just Another m
Should I be conscerned about httpd defunct processes?
--
James Gosnell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ#1727569
http://premed.dhs.org
