Stephen Clouse wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 06:25:26PM +1100, Stas Bekman wrote:
Hmm, you have perl 5.8.0. How is it possible that you don't have CGI.pm,
which is a part of the core?
It's probably a perl installed from a vendor-supplied package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 06:25:26PM +1100, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Hmm, you have perl 5.8.0. How is it possible that you don't have CGI.pm,
> which is a part of the core?
It's probably a perl installed from a vendor-supplied package. You'd be amazed
at
benjamin mccall wrote:
sorry, Stas...my former isp bit the dust and slammed me over to
monopolistic wolf, verizon. so, i had no access since your last post.
well, mod_perl is up and running. apparently the 'perlio' issue was
corrected by some simple authentication sweeps. as for the mysteriously
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 19:37:39 +1100
Subject: Re: glitched install of mod_perl (1.99.08)
benjamin mccall wrote:
> don't know, but my pulled zilch! ... could the absence of the two
> modules be reason for the test errors?
There is only one module reported missing
benjamin mccall wrote:
don't know, but my pulled zilch! ... could the absence of the two
modules be reason for the test errors?
There is only one module reported missing and it's CGI.pm. It has been
included in the core of 5.6.x and 5.8.x. Therefore we don't require this
version in Makefile.
don't know, but my pulled zilch! ... could the absence of the two
modules be reason for the test errors?
ben
- Original message -
From: "Stas Bekman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "benjamin mccall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 18:25:26 +
benjamin mccall wrote:
well, yes, by trick i meant that 'makefile.pl' and 'make && make test'
parts of the build proceeded rather normally. my loopback is up and
running:
...
loLink encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436
---
From: "Stas Bekman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "benjamin mccall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:59:20 +1100
Subject: Re: glitched install of mod_perl (1.99.08)
benjamin mccall wrote:
> well, i edited the /etc/hosts file and it seemed to've do
benjamin mccall wrote:
well, i edited the /etc/hosts file and it seemed to've done the trick.
Earlier you said that the patch to Apache/TestConfig.pm has done the trick.
but now it seems i'm taking heaps of test failures from 'make test' run.
if apache is inactive, would that cause these failu
7;,
'modules/cgiupload.t', and 'modules/cgi.t'.
ben
- Original message -
From: "Stas Bekman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "benjamin mccall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:29:22 +1100
Subject: Re: glitched ins
[benjamin, please always reply to the list, not to the poster who has answered
your question, unless asked otherwise]
benjamin mccall wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply on this one, Stas.
I ran the script, 'localhost' resulted. I applied the patch as you
advised, and it seems as though (i'm build
benjamin mccall wrote:
hi,
i'm having a problem with building mod_perl. what follows is a snapshot
of my procedure to administer the build:
perl: 5.8 installed (mthread)
apache2:(x.43)
mod_perl-1.99_08]# perl Makefile.PL MP_AP_PREFIX=/usr/local/apache2
...
Reading Makefile.PL args from @ARGV
hi,
i'm having a problem with building mod_perl. what follows is a snapshot
of my procedure to administer the build:
perl: 5.8 installed (mthread)
apache2:(x.43)
mod_perl-1.99_08]# perl Makefile.PL MP_AP_PREFIX=/usr/local/apache2
...
Reading Makefile.PL args from @ARGV
MP_AP_PREFIX = /usr/l
13 matches
Mail list logo
