Re: mod_accel reverse proxying?

2001-12-28 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Sat, 29 Dec 2001, Jeremy Howard wrote: > Philip Mak wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Igor Sysoev wrote: > > > I think it should have reverse syntax: > > > > > > AccelReverse http://127.0.0.1:8001/ / > > > > > > Or not ? Of course it complicates porting from mod_proxy to mod_accel > > > but I

Re: mod_accel reverse proxying?

2001-12-28 Thread Jeremy Howard
Philip Mak wrote: > On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Igor Sysoev wrote: > > I think it should have reverse syntax: > > > > AccelReverse http://127.0.0.1:8001/ / > > > > Or not ? Of course it complicates porting from mod_proxy to mod_accel > > but I think it's clearer then ProxyPassReverse syntax. > > I don

Re: mod_accel reverse proxying?

2001-12-28 Thread Philip Mak
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Igor Sysoev wrote: > Yes, it doesn't. It's difficult to figure proxied URL parts in mod_rewrite > so I have to make explicit directive to specify reverse rewrite. > I will make it today or tomorrow. Great! > I think it should have reverse syntax: > > AccelReverse http://12

Re: mod_accel reverse proxying?

2001-12-27 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Philip Mak wrote: > Does mod_accel have a reverse proxying directive (similar to the > ProxyPassReverse directive in mod_proxy) in order to make redirects work? Yes, AccelPass automatically handles reverse proxying in "Location" and "Refresh" headers. > I believe the "Accel

mod_accel reverse proxying?

2001-12-27 Thread Philip Mak
Does mod_accel have a reverse proxying directive (similar to the ProxyPassReverse directive in mod_proxy) in order to make redirects work? I believe the "AccelPass" directive automatically handles reverse proxying, but what if I used RewriteRule instead: RewriteRule ^(.*)\.asp$ http://127.0.0.1: