all-
Interesting topic, to be sure. Although no one touched on the relationship
I almost always see between Perl and PHP: Rapid Application
Deployment. You can get a massively complex application out to users as a
beta much more quickly with PHP (Sorry Perl), additionally capitalizing on
t
Hey Peter --
> I took over for some Russian programmers on one project
Wow... Sounds like there's a story in there somewhere! Is your client
suffering from globalization woes? :-)
> Most of the PHP reminds me of the older Perl4 style where a programmer
> might repeat the same code very
On 29 Aug 2002 at 19:47, Jesse Erlbaum wrote:
> I notice that you are using mod_perl AND mod_php.
>
> I have a general question for the list: Do people often use BOTH of
> these environments at the same time? It seems to me that there would be
> little benefit to using both. Am I mistaken?
M
Quoting Jesse Erlbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have a general question for the list: Do people often use BOTH of these
> environments at the same time? It seems to me that there would be little
> benefit to using both. Am I mistaken?
We have some old apps that are written in PHP, but are pred
* Jie Gao ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [30 Aug 2002 09:49]:
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Jesse Erlbaum wrote:
[...]
> > I notice that you are using mod_perl AND mod_php.
> >
> > I have a general question for the list: Do people often use BOTH of
> > these environments at the same time? It seems to me that there
Hey Andy --
> I'm using both at work because we're slowly migrating from PHP to Perl.
That reminds me of a project I started last year. We were charged with
assuming responsibility for a website built on ColdFusion. We moved the
site from Solaris/Netscape-Commerce to Linux/Apache-mod_perl. Ev
* Andy Lester ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [30 Aug 2002 10:33]:
[...]
> PHP is better than Perl in some cases, I've found. If you're
> predominantly templating and don't want to futz around with Mason or
> TT or whatever, PHP will do a fine job.
I'm naturally biased toward Perl, and generally the PHP I'v
> I have a general question for the list: Do people often use BOTH of these
> environments at the same time? It seems to me that there would be little
> benefit to using both. Am I mistaken?
I'm using both at work because we're slowly migrating from PHP to Perl.
PHP is better than Perl in som
, 2002 4:47 PM
Subject: mod_perl & mod_php
> Hi Ufuk --
>
> > Well what you said is true. I actuallay had perl 5.6.1 but I
> > tried to use an
> > old httpd executable compiled with 5.6.0. Adding directories to @INC
would
> > help me but each time before I would st
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Jesse Erlbaum wrote:
> > Well what you said is true. I actuallay had perl 5.6.1 but I
> > tried to use an
> > old httpd executable compiled with 5.6.0. Adding directories to @INC would
> > help me but each time before I would start httpd, I'd have to do that.
> > Instead I re
Hi Ufuk --
> Well what you said is true. I actuallay had perl 5.6.1 but I
> tried to use an
> old httpd executable compiled with 5.6.0. Adding directories to @INC would
> help me but each time before I would start httpd, I'd have to do that.
> Instead I recompiled mod_perl/apache/ssl/php bundle.
On Friday, June 1, 2001, at 08:33 am, Ged Haywood wrote:
>
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Martin Redington wrote:
>
>> I'm having some some difficulties with Apache 1.3.19 and
>> mod_perl/mod_php. [On Mac OS X]
>
> Never built on the Mac myself, some people had trouble,
Hi there,
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Martin Redington wrote:
> I'm having some some difficulties with Apache 1.3.19 and
> mod_perl/mod_php. [On Mac OS X]
Never built on the Mac myself, some people had trouble, looks like you're
an expert. From what I see on the mod_perl List about
I'm having some some difficulties with Apache 1.3.19 and
mod_perl/mod_php. Everything builds fine, but I get dyld multiple
definition errors in some circumstances. I believe this is connected to
the OX X dyld's insistence on freaking out with multiple definitions (so
non Mac OS X u
14 matches
Mail list logo
