-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 17:12:56 -0600
From: Carlos Ramirez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: David Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_perl site challenge: proposal to use ASF site design
> From: "David Harri
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 14:30:24 -0800 (PST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_perl site challenge: proposal to use ASF site design
David wrote:
> (a) See if others also think that the three alternatives for a mod_perl s
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > I propose that we simply use a site design that is the uniform
> > "psudo-standard" for the Apache Software Foundation. A number of ASF
> > projects are using this site design:
> > http://www.apache.org/
> > http://httpd.apache.org/
> > http://jakar
Hi!
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 04:17:02PM -0500, David Harris wrote:
As one of the three contributers I'd like to reply to some points you made:
> Thomas Klausner's isn't broken in anyway and acceptable, but I don't really
> *like* the page look very much.
The main goal of my proposial wasn't reall
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, David Harris wrote:
> (a) See if others also think that the three alternatives for a mod_perl site
> are not very desirable. If you agree, please speak up and say that you
> agree.
I thought Thomas' was fine but I think I actually prefer the ASF one.
> (b) See if others als
At 4:17 PM -0500 12/17/01, David Harris wrote:
>The purpose of this e-mail is as follows:
>
>(a) See if others also think that the three alternatives for a mod_perl site
>are not very desirable. If you agree, please speak up and say that you
>agree.
I agree.
>
>(b) See if others also think that
Hi,
I've been watching the mod_perl site issue as it has progressed. Just last
week Stas mentioned that voting at the online booth has been poor. (Low
turnout.) I think I know why voting has been poor. And in my off-list
conversation with Stas he's mentioned that other people have had the same
op
