Dana Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FastCGI with perl may or may not be that fast. I could be totally wrong here
but I believe that FastCGI will be able to cache the perl runtime, but perl
will still have to reload and recompile any scripts during every hit.
Not true.
You put some code
In addition, you can read the CGI.pm documentation on the use of
Perl/CGI.pm with FastCGI and you'll be good to go with that get next
request technique.
At 08:14 AM 7/7/00 +0100, David Hodgkinson wrote:
Dana Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FastCGI with perl may or may not be that fast. I
Hi!
Instaled : FreeBSD 4.0 + Apache 1.3.12 + mod_perl 1.24 + FastCGI 0.52
1) I installed apache with mod_perl - the speed increased.But I didn't
understand HOW mod_perl optimizes use of resources and increases speed ?
Does it share perl interpreter, script or anything else?
2) Then I installed
1) I installed apache with mod_perl - the speed increased.But I didn't
understand HOW mod_perl optimizes use of resources and increases speed ?
Does it share perl interpreter, script or anything else?
The Perl runtime library is linked into the server. The persistent
interpreter embedded in the
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, Pramod Sokke wrote:
1) I installed apache with mod_perl - the speed increased.But I didn't
understand HOW mod_perl optimizes use of resources and increases speed ?
Does it share perl interpreter, script or anything else?
The Perl runtime library is linked into the
Hi!
Instaled : FreeBSD 4.0 + Apache 1.3.12 + mod_perl 1.24 + FastCGI 0.52
1) I installed apache with mod_perl - the speed increased.But I didn't
understand HOW mod_perl optimizes use of resources and increases speed ?
Does it share perl interpreter, script or anything else?
2) Then I installed
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 09:36:44AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
"ES" == E S [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ES Why's that? I'm relatively new to mod_perl, at least in the sense of what
ES I've been using it for - what're the advantages of going with the direct
ES handler interface as opposed to
"Scott Thomason" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I know this must have been discussed before, but a mailing list archive search on
"fastcgi" didn't turn up much. What guidelines do you folks follow to determine
whether FastCGI or Apache::Registry is a better choice?
I've 90% written a little
There was a recent article in WebTechniques comparing the two
http://www.webtechniques.com/archives/2000/05/infrrevu/
-Original Message-
From: Scott Thomason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2000 4:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: re: mod_perl vs. FastCGI
You
"ST" == Scott Thomason [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ST in the past, and spent many agonizing hours cleaning up one-shot
ST CGI scripts so they would work (and on some, I just plain gave up
ST and let them run slow). Last project, I gave FastCGI a whirl (via
I wonder how these scripts on which you
Scott Thomason wrote:
So, given that, here's the question again: why would you choose Apache::Registry
over FastCGI? I want to be a believer...
First, I don't really recommend Registry, if you're serious about your
system you should use the direct handler interface and not just port a
bunch of
On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, Devin Ben-Hur wrote:
Scott Thomason wrote:
So, given that, here's the question again: why would you choose Apache::Registry
over FastCGI? I want to be a believer...
First, I don't really recommend Registry, if you're serious about your
system you should use the
12 matches
Mail list logo
