On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Todd Finney wrote:
> The only difficulty then remaining is the existing CGI
> scripts that this system wraps. There are several dozen of
> these in place already, and changing the argument handling
> would be rather tedious. Do you know of an easy method for
> handling th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Todd Finney) wrote:
>>Todd Finney wrote:
>> >
>> > This another follow-up to a previous thread, "maximum (practical)
>> > size of $r->notes", from last week. We're trying to redirect the
>> > output of $subr->run(), and return it as a variable instead of
>> > sending it to the
At 02:14 AM 11/6/00, Perrin Harkins wrote:
>Todd Finney wrote:
> >
> > This another follow-up to a previous thread, "maximum
> > (practical) size of $r->notes", from last week. We're
> > trying to redirect the output of $subr->run(), and
> return
> > it as a variable instead of sending it to th
Todd Finney wrote:
>
> This another follow-up to a previous thread, "maximum
> (practical) size of $r->notes", from last week. We're
> trying to redirect the output of $subr->run(), and return
> it as a variable instead of sending it to the browser.
Usually people consider this, realize that i
This another follow-up to a previous thread, "maximum
(practical) size of $r->notes", from last week. We're
trying to redirect the output of $subr->run(), and return
it as a variable instead of sending it to the browser.
I've poked around the mod_perl and Apache code, and it
doesn't look li
