RE: please comment on new art for perl.apache.org

1999-10-12 Thread Neil Kandalgaonkar
At 17:37 -0400 1999-10-11, Alex Schmelkin wrote: > 1. What browsers are different percentages of your user populations >using? > 2. What screen resolutions are different percentages of your user >populations using? > 3. What purpose will the site serve - simply providing informat

[SITE] Preparation and ideas (was: please comment on new art for perl.apache.org)

1999-10-11 Thread Robin Berjon
At 17:37 11/10/1999 -0400, Alex Schmelkin wrote: >While I'm sure Matt Arnold's effort to redesign perl.apache.org is greatly >appreciated by everyone on this list, it seems to me that a bit more >preparation and interface design should actually go into the final product. Indeed. I know the curren

Re: please comment on new art for perl.apache.org

1999-10-11 Thread Ray Zimmerman
At 4:40 PM -0700 10/11/99, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > > "Jeffrey" == Jeffrey Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >Jeffrey> 1) and 2) are easy. All of them, and all of them. To design >Jeffrey> considering anything else is suicide. > >Seconded. Properly designed HTML works in the Nokia Comm

Re: please comment on new art for perl.apache.org

1999-10-11 Thread Jeffrey Baker
Alex Schmelkin wrote: > 1. What browsers are different percentages of your user populations using? > 2. What screen resolutions are different percentages of your user > populations using? > 3. What purpose will the site serve - simply providing information, or a > marketing

Re: please comment on new art for perl.apache.org

1999-10-11 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Jeffrey" == Jeffrey Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jeffrey> 1) and 2) are easy. All of them, and all of them. To design Jeffrey> considering anything else is suicide. Seconded. Properly designed HTML works in the Nokia Communicator and on my[*] 2000 pixel Monster Screen. It's not t

RE: please comment on new art for perl.apache.org

1999-10-11 Thread Alex Schmelkin
EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Jesse Kanner > Sent: Monday, October 11, 1999 11:12 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: please comment on new art for perl.apache.org > > > > > On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, Matt Arnold wrote: > > >I have created a new page layout/temp

Re: please comment on new art for perl.apache.org

1999-10-11 Thread Jesse Kanner
On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, Matt Arnold wrote: >I have created a new page layout/template for perl.apache.org. You can take >a look at it at http://www.novia.net/~marnold/mod_perl/sample_3/ Please let >me know if you think it's suitable for use on perl.apache.org. If not, how >could it be improved?

RE: Re: please comment on new art for perl.apache.org

1999-10-11 Thread ricarDo oliveiRa
I agree with remi. Make a little bit more... Tuareg, y'know? But it's great as it is! ./Ricardo --Original Message-- From: Remi Fasol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Matt Arnold<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: October 11, 1999 8:51:40 AM GMT Subject: R

Re: please comment on new art for perl.apache.org

1999-10-11 Thread Remi Fasol
>-- Matt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://www.novia.net/~marnold/mod_perl/sample_3/ i really like the camel against the sun with the apache feather. > sure to include any good ideas you have about > alternate designs.) maybe you can make it more 'desert-y'. more like sandstone. may

please comment on new art for perl.apache.org

1999-10-10 Thread Matt Arnold
I have created a new page layout/template for perl.apache.org. You can take a look at it at http://www.novia.net/~marnold/mod_perl/sample_3/ Please let me know if you think it's suitable for use on perl.apache.org. If not, how could it be improved? And if the majority hates it, I can certainly