which framework is best suitable for modperl?

2016-07-19 Thread yhpeng
Though I have written several handlers using mp2, but for further web development under modperl, what framework do you suggest to go with? (I have few experience on Dancer, which I don't think work together with MP). thanks.

Re: ApacheCon: Getting the word out internally

2016-07-19 Thread yhpeng
On 2016/7/20 2:07, William A Rowe Jr wrote: It isn't undergoing significant changes, but 2.0.9 fixed several bugs and brought it up-to-date with then-current perl releases a year ago June, and I understand there is some activity to have it build well with 5.24. Thanks for the info. I have bee

Re: ApacheCon: Getting the word out internally

2016-07-19 Thread William A Rowe Jr
It isn't undergoing significant changes, but 2.0.9 fixed several bugs and brought it up-to-date with then-current perl releases a year ago June, and I understand there is some activity to have it build well with 5.24. On Jul 18, 2016 10:17 PM, wrote: > Hi, > > Is Apache modperl still in active d

Re: ApacheCon: Getting the word out internally

2016-07-19 Thread pali
On Tuesday 19 July 2016 05:19:26 Jie Gao wrote: > * yhp...@orange.fr wrote: > > Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 11:17:01 +0800 > > From: yhp...@orange.fr > > To: modperl@perl.apache.org > > Subject: Re: ApacheCon: Getting the word out internally > > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0)

Re: ApacheCon: Getting the word out internally

2016-07-19 Thread Ruben Safir
On 07/19/2016 05:37 AM, James Smith wrote: > > > On 7/19/2016 9:58 AM, yhp...@orange.fr wrote: >> Jie, >> >> I have been using Apache::DBI, but I don't think it is something like >> JDBC. >> There is a ODBC driver under DBD if someone wanted to use it (for whatever reason) > Thankfully not - JD

Re: ApacheCon: Getting the word out internally

2016-07-19 Thread Vincent Veyron
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 16:58:54 +0800 yhp...@orange.fr wrote: > > On 2016/7/19 16:55, Jie Gao wrote: > > > > * yhp...@orange.fr wrote: > > > >> but, does modperl have something like JDBC, the database connection pool? > > > > See http://dbi.perl.org/ . > > > > I have been using Apache::DBI, but I

Re: ApacheCon: Getting the word out internally

2016-07-19 Thread yhpeng
how about this module for connection caching? http://search.cpan.org/~timb/DBI-1.636/lib/DBD/Gofer.pm thanks On 2016/7/19 17:37, James Smith wrote: On 7/19/2016 9:58 AM, yhp...@orange.fr wrote: Jie, I have been using Apache::DBI, but I don't think it is something like JDBC. Thankfully not

Re: ApacheCon: Getting the word out internally

2016-07-19 Thread James Smith
On 7/19/2016 9:58 AM, yhp...@orange.fr wrote: Jie, I have been using Apache::DBI, but I don't think it is something like JDBC. Thankfully not - JDBC is one of the biggest nightmares our DBAs face - if we have network issues (firewall session timeout e.g.) we have had all sorts of problems

Re: ApacheCon: Getting the word out internally

2016-07-19 Thread yhpeng
Jie, I have been using Apache::DBI, but I don't think it is something like JDBC. regards. On 2016/7/19 16:55, Jie Gao wrote: * yhp...@orange.fr wrote: but, does modperl have something like JDBC, the database connection pool? See http://dbi.perl.org/ . Regards, Jie

Re: ApacheCon: Getting the word out internally

2016-07-19 Thread Jie Gao
* yhp...@orange.fr wrote: > but, does modperl have something like JDBC, the database connection pool? See http://dbi.perl.org/ . Regards, Jie

Re: ApacheCon: Getting the word out internally

2016-07-19 Thread yhpeng
On 2016/7/19 16:45, James Smith wrote: Probably once it becomes more prevelant - the perl6 community is still relatively small {moving current perl 5 codebases to it will be none-trivial} and most will not see the gain from doing so... It will take time for traction (similar to other moves like

Re: ApacheCon: Getting the word out internally

2016-07-19 Thread James Smith
On 7/19/2016 4:26 AM, yhp...@orange.fr wrote: so, will go for support of perl6? Probably once it becomes more prevelant - the perl6 community is still relatively small {moving current perl 5 codebases to it will be none-trivial} and most will not see the gain from doing so... It will take ti