On 09/11/2016 02:35 AM, Eric Aarts wrote:
> Only non-issue – and only on stopping/restarting service apache2 – are
> lines like these in the apache2 error.log:
>
> [Sun Sep 11 08:31:00.430150 2016] [mpm_prefork:notice] [pid 15239] AH00169:
> caught SIGTERM, shutting down
>
> [ error] oh jeez, se
On our Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS, after installing mod_perl (simply out-of-the-box
with apt-get), CGI.pm installs:
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl5/5.22/FCGI.pm
/usr/share/perl5/CGI.pm
We have 20+ Ubuntu LTS instances running on Google Cloud Platform, 12.04,
14.04 and 16.04, on all mod_perl and CGI.pm
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Igor Chudov wrote:
> I can, and will of course, install CGI myself as all my sites use it and I
> have 84,000 lines written using it.
> My concern is that it will break at some point going forward if it is not
> maintained.
>
Out of curiosity, why do you think th
On 09/10/2016 09:53 PM, Igor Chudov wrote:
> It turns out that HTML has a very minor and subordinate role to perl
> application logic, and putting "perl inside html" was completely misguided
> and instead I decided to "make html inside perl". Using CGI module of
> course. This was far more maintain
Can you use Dancer2 for multiple websites?
Can it handle, say, 170 object requests per second? (which is what my main
webserver does at the peak times)?
I looked at those templates .tt. I see how they have attempts at
conditional HTML generation based on application logic.
They reminded me about
> On 10 Sep 2016, at 15:41, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> I'd probably choose Dancer2 for new work now myself, but if you want 20
> year support you might prefer looking towards Catalyst, or perhaps even
> building something for yourself on top of Plack.
>
+1 for Dancer2
And proxy to it with nginx t
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 08:18:53AM -0500, Igor Chudov wrote:
> Tom, thanks for your kind words.
>
> I can, and will of course, install CGI myself as all my sites use it and I
> have 84,000 lines written using it.
>
> My concern is that it will break at some point going forward if it is not
> main
Tom, thanks for your kind words.
I can, and will of course, install CGI myself as all my sites use it and I
have 84,000 lines written using it.
My concern is that it will break at some point going forward if it is not
maintained.
I try to use CGI.pm in ways that are not questionable, such as usi
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Igor Chudov wrote:
> I hope that this message would not be considered off topic.
...
> I always considered the CGI perl module to be a work of a genius. How it
I agree, and use it, too.
...
> OK, so now, as of ubuntu 16.04, CGI is considered obsolete and is bein
I hope that this message would not be considered off topic.
I have been developing web apps since 1996 and have about 84,000 lines of
perl code implementing various websites that I own. I do not work for
anybody, own all websites that I work on, and these sites feed my family.
The largest websit
10 matches
Mail list logo
