Hello,
I use PerlTransHandler to decide if I want to intercept and serve a
request or not. When the request is served by my content handler there
is no file that corresponds to it, directly or indirectly.
I used to just not call $r->filename(...) at all. But under Gentoo's
overtightened default
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 12:31:59PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Andrew Maltsev wrote:
> [...]
> >>Slurp STDIN before you call CGI->new() into an IO::String object,
> >
> >
> > Can't. I get references to $cgi and $r, that's given. I tried ge
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 11:42:43AM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Andrew Maltsev wrote:
> > So far I can only see customizing CGI.pm to make it save original
> > POST'ed content.
>
> If Geoff's module doesn't work for you, you could do the following:
The appli
Here is the situation. There is sort of web service (Ariba buyer for
those who cares) that posts plain unencoded XML using POST method to a
mod_perl 1.x application.
Somewhere at the very top the application does
use CGI;
my $cgi=CGI->new();
and then passes this $cgi reference around. Assuming t
I'm having some problems converting a 1.x mod_perl application to 2.x
mod_perl.
I use redhat 9, mod_perl-1.99_07-5 rpm, httpd-2.0.40-21.5 rpm, perl
5.8.0, pre-fork mpm.
The way the application works is that it installs a TransHandler
to decide if it needs to bother handling content (based on uri
Here is the setup:
mod_perl2: redhat 9, mod_perl-1.99_07-5 rpm, httpd-2.0.40-21.5 rpm,
perl 5.8.0, pre-fork mpm.
mod_perl1: redhat 7.1, mod_perl 1.26, httpd 1.3.22, perl 5.6.1.
I am having some problems porting an application from mod_perl1 to
mod_perl2.
The application installs a PerlTransHand
