On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 01:45:57PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Taking this another step further, I don't get the impression that perlbal or
> pound will achieve the "temporary" caching on the middle-proxy server
> allowing the back-end server to get back to other requests.
>
> Anyone know for
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 12:51:17PM -0400, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 18:41 +0200, Harmen wrote:
> > It _is_ stored on disk, save for powerfailures, but all the data needs to
> > fit in ram. So it's limited to the amount of ram you can give mysql.
>
>
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 12:32:41PM -0400, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 11:28 -0500, Jeremy Brooks wrote:
> > There's also clustering in MySQL 5 that looks very enticing to me as an
> > additional layer or scale out and redundancy. It's not your typical
> > master/slave scenario an
f active servers. If you've got enough
redundancy nobody will notice any difference.
> On 5/9/06, Harmen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 04:47:14PM +0800, Ken Perl wrote:
> >> Is it possible to make a modperl application to run in cluster? if
> >&g
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 04:47:14PM +0800, Ken Perl wrote:
> Is it possible to make a modperl application to run in cluster? if
> yes, how to do that? any doc?
Take a few mod_perl servers and put one pound (http://www.apsis.ch/poung/)
reverse
proxy in front of them.
Works great.
--
fix/work
around this? (besides subclassing Apache::Request)
Groeten,
Harmen
Garagebedrijf Het Vierkantje.
--
The Moon is Waning Crescent (22% of Full)
