On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 08:39 -0700, Praveen Ray wrote:
> I suspect its because we've written a large number of
> moderately complex macros
Could be. You can probably test this fairly simply by globally removing
the macro calls and benchmarking.
> Or, is it the fact that TT uses string concatenati
> > The
> > Template-Toolkit is getting rather slow for our needs
> and
> > I'm looking around for alternatives.
>
> That's pretty surprising. Pure template processing is
> your bottleneck?
> Are you doing some kind of data processing or data
> retrieval from
> inside of your templates?
I su
at is on the site, i'd suggest
going through the Trac svn repository browser/ticketing system --
it's all done in clearsilver templates via python.
i've always found looking at functional implementations of templating
systems easier to understand than the documentation
Praveen Ray wrote:
Does anyone have any experience of using clearsilver
(http://www.clearsilver.net) with mod_perl (1 or 2)?
I remember talking to the author at one point.
Any comparisons of this with Template-Toolkit?
It will be less flexible (no simple handling of objects or complex
stru
Hi
Does anyone have any experience of using clearsilver
(http://www.clearsilver.net) with mod_perl (1 or 2)?
Any comparisons of this with Template-Toolkit? The
Template-Toolkit is getting rather slow for our needs and
I'm looking around for alternatives.
thanks
- Praveen
_
