On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:00:20AM +0200, Torsten Foertsch wrote:
> For 2.4 kernel series the figures got from /proc/PID/statm are as valid as
> the
> figures from Linux::Smaps for kernels 2.6.14 and higher. For 2.6.0 up to
> 2.6.13 there is no way to count COW (shared by copy-on-write) pages. S
On Monday 01 May 2006 21:00, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> No. The current best bet is Linux::Smaps, which Apache2::SizeLimit now
> uses.
For 2.4 kernel series the figures got from /proc/PID/statm are as valid as the
figures from Linux::Smaps for kernels 2.6.14 and higher. For 2.6.0 up to
2.6.13 ther
On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 10:56 -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> Anyone familiar with pmap on linux?
No. The current best bet is Linux::Smaps, which Apache2::SizeLimit now
uses.
> I tend (and hope!) to believe GTop.
Don't believe it. It's probably getting the same numbers you'd get
from /proc/self/sta
Apache/2.0.55 (Debian) mod_perl/2.0.2 Perl/v5.8.8
I'm testing out a Catalyst application running under mod_perl (was
using fastcgi before). I'm trying to get a grasp on the memory used
by the processes.
Anyone familiar with pmap on linux? There's this description of using
pmap to determine sha
