There is a consideration, regarding using a proxy or a different server,
that has not been brought up: If there is mod_perl based access control
for the static files, then it's basically impossible not to go through a
mod_perl server to serve them.
If you're access control is in mod_perl, you ha
On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:36 PM, Perrin Harkins wrote:
On 4/18/07, Denis Banovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it possible to configure Perlbal so there is no single point of
failure?
That sort of high-availability setup is beyond the scope of an
application-level load balancer like Perlbal.
On 4/18/07, Denis Banovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it possible to configure Perlbal so there is no single point of failure?
That sort of high-availability setup is beyond the scope of an
application-level load balancer like Perlbal. You need to use
something that allows for IP takeover.
ECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. April 2007 18:46
An: Perrin Harkins
Cc: Clinton Gormley; modperl@perl.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Growing Up
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:48:57 -0400
"Perrin Harkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/17/07, Clinton Gormley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On 4/17/07, Rafael Caceres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is a consideration, regarding using a proxy or a different server,
that has not been brought up: If there is mod_perl based access control
for the static files, then it's basically impossible not to go through a
mod_perl server to serve
move the database off that machine and start
> the growing up process.
>
> I am looking for next steps to growing up from this machine. Can
> somebody recommend a good article, presentation or document that
> advocates various strategies to growing up the current architecture
>
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:48:57 -0400
"Perrin Harkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/17/07, Clinton Gormley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > is it reasonable to serve your static files from a mod_perl server,
> > as long as you have a proxy/pound/squid in front?
>
> Yes, but spending no time in mo
On 4/17/07, Clinton Gormley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
is it reasonable to serve your static files from a mod_perl server, as
long as you have a proxy/pound/squid in front?
Yes, but spending no time in mod_perl for a static file is better than
spending a little time, and the files will be serve
On Apr 17, 2007, at 3:55 AM, Clinton Gormley wrote:
Must disagree with you about pound http://www.apsis.ch/pound/
index_html
being a PITA to configure and maintain.
Pound is really easy to configure, fast as all hell, and just never
goes
down. I've been using it for about 3 years now and
> switch to a lightweight proxy + httpd on port 80. i like nginx
> because its had much fewer critical bugs than lighttpd. others like
> lighty. either will be fine - they'll free up apache to deal with
> content generation and you'll see a ginormous performance boost off
> that .
On 4/16/07, Will Fould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am looking for next steps to growing up from this machine. Can somebody
recommend a good article, presentation or document that advocates various
strategies to growing up the current architecture (i.e. basic load
balancing, network to
chine
and start the growing up process.
I am looking for next steps to growing up from this machine. Can
somebody recommend a good article, presentation or document that
advocates various strategies to growing up the current architecture
(i.e. basic load balancing, network topology, switches
; machine with intention to move the database off that machine and
> start the growing up process.
>
> I am looking for next steps to growing up from this machine. Can
> somebody recommend a good article, presentation or document that
> advocates various strategies to growing up th
Hi,
I have a service that is currently running a basic LAMP stack with mod_perl
and life has been good!
The site running has been getting very busy and I've ordered a second
machine with intention to move the database off that machine and start the
growing up process.
I am looking for
14 matches
Mail list logo
