> On 20 Aug 2017, at 11:45, Ben RUBSON wrote:
>
> I managed to get ride of (...)
to get rid, you will have corrected :)
> On 20 Aug 2017, at 11:28, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
>
> On 19.08.2017 23:29, Ben RUBSON wrote:
>>> On 19 Aug 2017, at 22:40, Ben RUBSON wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> I have a question regarding tuning @INC at VirtualHost level, with prefork
>>> MPM.
>>> (...)
>>> will I have 2 (2 dif
On 19.08.2017 23:29, Ben RUBSON wrote:
On 19 Aug 2017, at 22:40, Ben RUBSON wrote:
Hi list,
I have a question regarding tuning @INC at VirtualHost level, with prefork MPM.
(...)
will I have 2 (2 different PerlSwitches configurations)
or 11 (11 different VH using PerlSwitches) interpreters laun
> On 19 Aug 2017, at 22:40, Ben RUBSON wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> I have a question regarding tuning @INC at VirtualHost level, with prefork
> MPM.
> (...)
> will I have 2 (2 different PerlSwitches configurations)
> or 11 (11 different VH using PerlSwitches) interpreters launched ?
Well, reading
Hi list,
I have a question regarding tuning @INC at VirtualHost level, with prefork MPM.
In the doc :
https://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/config/config.html#Modifying_C__INC__on_a_Per_VirtualHost
is written :
"under prefork your procs will be huge, because
you will build a pool of interpreters
