Perrin Harkins schrieb:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Michael Ludwig
wrote:
On the other hand, performance isn't what you'd call great, as access
to the database is effectively serialized.
Are you sure about that?
I'm sure about the queries seeming *effectively* serialized, judging
from
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Michael Ludwig wrote:
> On the other hand, performance isn't what you'd call great, as access to
> the database is effectively serialized.
Are you sure about that? Berkeley DB doesn't work that way. It has
read and write locks which can be set to work at a (memo
A sidenote:
I've built more or less the same Apache as a prefork MPM, and I'm not
seeing any SEGVs any more.
On the other hand, performance isn't what you'd call great, as access to
the database is effectively serialized. Thirty queries will take thirty
seconds, regardless of concurrency level.
Mark Hedges schrieb:
Just curious, did you try eliminating every other module
that you might be loading (anywhere in any module loaded by
Apache)? i.e. did you try a simple setup that only tries
to open your database and does absolutely nothing else and
loads no other CPAN modules. With "use
Torsten Foertsch schrieb:
Of course it depends on your setup. If you configure only a small
number of interpreters then the overall memory footprint can be lower
then with prefork where each process runs its own interpreter. But the
effect of the copied interpreters outweighs this very soon.
I
On Mon 19 Jan 2009, Michael Ludwig wrote:
> > In fact, it is worse than fork()ing off unix processes because the
> > interpreter data is completely copied while a new interpreter is
> > created. On the other hand a forked process copies only those pages
> > that are written to.
>
> Thanks. If I'm u
Torsten Foertsch schrieb:
On Sun 18 Jan 2009, Michael Ludwig wrote:
Hmm. Not sure what to make of this threaded Perl.
In fact, it is worse than fork()ing off unix processes because the
interpreter data is completely copied while a new interpreter is
created. On the other hand a forked process
macke...@animalhead.com schrieb:
Yes it is now Abend again. Timewise this is like relationships I
have had with Philips (now NXP) European colleagues...
And a new morning again, and it goes round and round ...
On Jan 18, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Michael Ludwig wrote:
macke...@animalhead.com schr
On Sun 18 Jan 2009, Michael Ludwig wrote:
> From perldoc perlthrtut: "In this model each thread runs in its own
> Perl interpreter, and any data sharing between threads must be
> explicit." This does not sound to me as if there is a significant
> advantage over spawning child processes, at least n
I've referenced this thread on the Oracle Berkeley DB forum.
Chances are it'll catch the attention of one of the BDB experts.
If you're interested, please see:
http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=848390
Michael Ludwig
macke...@animalhead.com schrieb:
What I did to get worker and event working under FreeBSD 6.3,
was to eliminate the child_init handler, and at the start of
the response handler do something like
my $env;
sub handler { # this is the response handler
my ($r) = @_;
if (!$env) {
$e
What I did to get worker and event working under FreeBSD 6.3,
was to eliminate the child_init handler, and at the start of
the response handler do something like
my $env;
sub handler { # this is the response handler
my ($r) = @_;
if (!$env) {
$env = DbEnv->new;
Mark Hedges schrieb:
*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x084e6a14 ***
If this didn't work in a response handler, I'd guess there's
something else wrong. That's the kind of error you get when
you use things under threads that are not thread-safe in
some way, I remember that sort
I started with 'worker', and it had similar performance to
what I saw thereafter with 'event'. Actually slightly better,
perhaps because 'event' gained no advantage from KeepAlive
because each test process stayed locked to one connection.
'worker' and 'event' were experiments that I decided to
t
macke...@animalhead.com wrote:
Apache is forgiving/robust about specifying nonexistent phase
handlers in httpd.conf and inserts thereto.
I was using event, and had to let each thread open its own DBs
based on an undefined global. Then I found that the identical
traffic-test exerciser could get
macke...@animalhead.com schrieb:
Apache is forgiving/robust about specifying nonexistent phase
handlers in httpd.conf and inserts thereto.
Thanks. I noticed. :-)
I was using event, and had to let each thread open its own DBs
based on an undefined global. Then I found that the identical
traff
Mark Hedges schrieb:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Michael Ludwig wrote:
PerlRequire /home/milu/www/eumel/startup.pl
PerlChildInitHandler Eumel::Gurke::bla;
PerlChildExitHandler Eumel::Gurke2::bla;
No trailing semicolons?
That was a copy and paste error when composing the mail. But this is an
impor
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Michael Ludwig wrote:
> PerlRequire /home/milu/www/eumel/startup.pl
> PerlChildInitHandler Eumel::Gurke::bla;
> PerlChildExitHandler Eumel::Gurke2::bla;
No trailing semicolons?
Probably if you first do PerlLoadModule Foo::Bar it will
fail and inform you
> > my $container
Apache is forgiving/robust about specifying nonexistent phase
handlers in httpd.conf and inserts thereto.
I was using event, and had to let each thread open its own DBs
based on an undefined global. Then I found that the identical
traffic-test exerciser could get 66 files/second back in event
an
anyway.
Your startup.pl script is running before the root apache
process forks into the child processes. Scalars, lists and
hashes will be cloned, but file handles won't, they have to
be opened.
Cloning might not be what the DbEnv, XmlManager and XmlContainer
objects need, or tolerate.
O
Mark Hedges schrieb:
Probably what you're thinking of is a PerlChildInitHandler
so that each mod_perl child process does your connection for
you when the child process first forks.
Yes, that's what I thought. But then I noticed that the
PerlChildInitHandler I set up is ignored. Apache configura
cr...@animalhead.com wrote:
I have a vague recollection of reading about the
circumstances in which filehandles can be inherited, but
can't remember where.
I've been bitten by this a few times. Filehandles (and thus sockets) are inherited across forks. If
your system isn't very busy you won'
This is my first time replying to the list. I've seen
advice about not being able to share a filehandle opened
in a pre-fork stage before, but have two counter-examples:
1) I opened a log file for write/append in the open-logs
stage of a module, and was able to (flock and) write to it
in child p
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Michael Ludwig wrote:
> I want to build a mod_perl2 application using
> Sleepycat::DbXml. This is
>
> However, I don't know how to do this. Currently, I'm
> trying to set up things in startup.pl (loaded via
> PerlPostConfigRequire), store the database environment
> handle in
I want to build a mod_perl2 application using Sleepycat::DbXml. This is
the Perl bindings to the C++ interface to Berkeley DB and Berkeley DB
XML, developed by Sleepycat, now owned by Oracle (keywords: DbEnv,
XmlManager, XmlContainer).
Has anyone ever used this combination?
Note I'm using Apache
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Hello!
Is there any way to access server and request objects
when script is running under Registry?
# From the top-level
my $r = shift;
OR
# PerlOptions +GlobalRequest
# Apache2::RequestUtil
(http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/api/Apache2/RequestUtil.html#C_request_)
use
access server and request objects
when script is running under Registry?
--
Regards,
Artem
Hello!
Is there any way to access server and request objects
when script is running under Registry?
--
Regards,
Artem
m all processes later, but if
> > > you change it in one process, the change will not be seen in the
> > > others. With objects that contain open sockets, file handles, or XS
> > > structures, you usually can't share them at all.
> >
> > Is when they can
ange will not be seen in the
> > others. With objects that contain open sockets, file handles, or XS
> > structures, you usually can't share them at all.
>
> Is when they can be shared? and if my file handle is open of "ro" it
> can share between process
2008/4/3, Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Felipe de Jesús Molina Bravo
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I know I can share data between processes, but what I also shared
> objects?
>
>
> It depends on what you me
ycat::DBXML) from dbxml; then I create an object (reference
> to
> > Sleepycat::DBXML) in startup.pl because i want to share it. After some
> test
> > (stress it) for my application I saw some error in error.log; the
> problem is
> > that reference to object created in startu
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Felipe de Jesús Molina Bravo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know I can share data between processes, but what I also shared objects?
It depends on what you mean by share. You can create a simple perl
object in startup.pl and access it from all proces
tup.pl because i want to share it. After some test
> (stress it) for my application I saw some error in error.log; the problem is
> that reference to object created in startup.pl was lost
>
> then the question is ... is possible to share objects?
>
If your object has its own package
problem is
that reference to object created in startup.pl was lost
then the question is ... is possible to share objects?
I know I can share data between processes, but what I also shared objects?
thanks in advance
Jeremy Nixon am Dienstag, 15. November 2005 23.16:
> John Doe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hope it's not a stupid question, but are you sure %d_cache survives a
> > request? Maybe I'm totally misunderstanding something but I thought
> > after the point
> >
> > } end lexical scope
> >
> > %d_cac
On 2005-11-15, at 03.11, Peter1 Alvin wrote:
Using mod_perl, how do you keep Perl objects in RAM from page to page?
I don't want to re-instantiate my objects on every page request, and I
don't want the overhead of serializing my objects to a persistent store
from page to page (I
On 2005-11-15, at 03.11, Peter1 Alvin wrote:
Please tell me I can do this!
Using mod_perl, how do you keep Perl objects in RAM from page to page? I don't want to re-instantiate my objects on every page request, and I don't want the overhead of serializing my objects to a persis
Leo Lapworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think this would work...
>
> You can set up a global variable within your startup.pl (before apache
> spawns child processed) and all children will get it, but if you
> edit it in anyway the changes are only reflected in that specific child
> pro
John Doe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hope it's not a stupid question, but are you sure %d_cache survives a
> request? Maybe I'm totally misunderstanding something but I thought
> after the point
>
> } end lexical scope
>
> %d_cache gets destroyed (if not still referenced from somewhere else)
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 14:53 -0600, David Nicol wrote:
> Or you could toss your apache server and write to Http::Server::Singlethreaded
> isntead of mod_perl
Or POE for that matter. That wouldn't be very effective if you do a lot
of DBI or other blocking calls, but it could work if the data is all
On 11/15/05, Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter1 Alvin wrote:
> > I can't believe Perl doesn't support keeping objects in RAM. This would
> > de-qualify Perl for half of the projects I need to develop.
>
> There are languages with better threa
Peter1 Alvin wrote:
Using mod_perl, how do you keep Perl objects in RAM from page to page?
I don't want to re-instantiate my objects on every page request, and I
don't want the overhead of serializing my objects to a persistent store
from page to page (I use A LOT of objects).
I
David Baird wrote:
No, the 'reference' to the lexical variable doesn't need to be a 'Perl
reference', just some mention of the variable in the code. That will
make it stick around, but only within the lexical scope specified.
David is correct. This is called a closure. Any use of a lexical
v
On 11/15/05, Leo Lapworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 15 Nov 2005, at 11:35, John Doe wrote:
> >>> Hope it's not a stupid question, but are you sure %d_cache
> >>> survives a
> >>> request? Maybe I'm totally misunderstanding something but I
> >>> thought after
> >>> the point
> >>>
> >>> } en
On 11/15/05, John Doe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Baird am Dienstag, 15. November 2005 11.07:
> > On 11/15/05, John Doe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Jeremy Nixon am Dienstag, 15. November 2005 08.06:
> > > > Peter1 Alvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > > > { # start a lexical sco
John Doe am Dienstag, 15. November 2005 12.35:
> David Baird am Dienstag, 15. November 2005 11.07:
> > On 11/15/05, John Doe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Jeremy Nixon am Dienstag, 15. November 2005 08.06:
> > > > Peter1 Alvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > > { # start a lexical s
On 15 Nov 2005, at 11:35, John Doe wrote:
Hope it's not a stupid question, but are you sure %d_cache
survives a
request? Maybe I'm totally misunderstanding something but I
thought after
the point
} end lexical scope
%d_cache gets destroyed (if not still referenced from somewhere
else).
David Baird am Dienstag, 15. November 2005 11.07:
> On 11/15/05, John Doe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jeremy Nixon am Dienstag, 15. November 2005 08.06:
> > > Peter1 Alvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > > { # start a lexical scope
> > > my %d_cache;
> > > sub handler {
> > > # stuff
>
On 11/15/05, John Doe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeremy Nixon am Dienstag, 15. November 2005 08.06:
> > Peter1 Alvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Please tell me I can do this!
> > >
> > > Using mod_perl, how do you keep Perl objects in RAM
Jeremy Nixon am Dienstag, 15. November 2005 08.06:
> Peter1 Alvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please tell me I can do this!
> >
> > Using mod_perl, how do you keep Perl objects in RAM from page to page?
[...]
> As an example, I have a handler that needs to read
On 15 Nov 2005, at 02:11, Peter1 Alvin wrote: Please tell me I can do this! Using mod_perl, how do you keep Perl objects in RAM from page to page? I don't want to re-instantiate my objects on every page request, and I don't want the overhead of serializing my objects to a persis
You
could use memcached, see Cache::Memcached on CPAN
it
works great!
Denis
Von: Peter1 Alvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. November 2005 03:11An:
modperl@perl.apache.orgBetreff: mod_perl: How pass variables
(objects) from page to page?
Please tell me I can do
Peter1 Alvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please tell me I can do this!
>
> Using mod_perl, how do you keep Perl objects in RAM from page to page?
> I don't want to re-instantiate my objects on every page request, and I
> don't want the overhead of serializing m
Please tell me I can do this!
Using mod_perl, how do you keep Perl objects in RAM from page to page? I don't want to re-instantiate my objects on every page request, and I don't want the overhead of serializing my objects to a persistent store from page to page (I use A LOT
On mandag 20 juni 2005, 20:26, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> > Uh, actually, that's what I did in my first version, as it is the
> > intuitive thing to do, and couldn't get it to do what it should...
> > To me, it looked as if just the hash was passed, not the tied
> > object... Of course, it could be th
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 20:22 +0200, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> > No, you want the hash, not the object it's tied to:
> > $r->pnotes('session' => \%session);
> >
> > Then use it like this:
> > my $session_ref = $r->pnotes('session');
> > $session->{'key'} = 'value';
>
> Uh, actually, that's what I did
On Friday 17 June 2005 06:00, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> > I currently assign to pnotes like this:
> > $r->pnotes(session => tied %session);
>
> No, you want the hash, not the object it's tied to:
> $r->pnotes('session' => \%session);
>
> Then use it like this:
> my $session_ref = $r->pnotes('sess
Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
OK, I have been working a couple of nights now to do this, and have been
making some progress. But I seem to have difficulties with actually
passing the tied hash, that is, making sure I pass the actually tied
object, not just the data hash.
I currently assign to pnote
Hi and thanks for the response!
On onsdag 15 juni 2005, 10:06, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> Ideally, I would suggest you stop putting your session in a global.
> That's just asking for trouble.
Yeah, I've had ambitions to do this for a long time, but not really a
way to implement it gracefully.
>
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 00:51 +0200, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> To elaborate on some details from there, things go wrong when we
> invalidate a session, as the session is supposed to be untied. However,
> as described in the Camel Book (pp. 395), this can't happen because we
> still have references
Hi all!
I took over maintenance of AxKit::XSP::BasicSession some time ago from
Mike Nachbaur, who wrote it. Recently, we have discovered it has some
really bad issues. We have discussed the problems in the usual dahut
hangouts, but well, the short story is that none of us grok tie-ing
well eno
> -Original Message-
> From: Perrin Harkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 3:13 PM
> To: Barksdale, Ray
> Cc: mod_perl
> Subject: Re: sharing big global hash and objects
>
>
> Does that work? It looks really strange t
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 13:56 -0600, Barksdale, Ray wrote:
> The module containing $hash is loaded in startup.pl at boot.
> I then have a package that creates an object based on a slice of the hash:
>
> package FooBar;
>
> use Config qw($hash);
>
> sub new {
> my ($class, $table, $field) = @
I have a large structure loaded from a db table that contains parameter
values.
The structure looks something like following (please excuse formatting, MS
lookOut)
my $hash = {
table1 => {
field1 => {
param1 => val,
param2 =>
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 12:26 -0500, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
> I never thought of using storable.
There's no need for you to use Storable. Apache::Session does it
already. Just put your objects in the session.
> I thought i could just place an object in the tied session variable a
On Feb 2, 2005, at 12:00 AM, David J Radunz wrote:
Have you tried to freeze your object and then thaw it on retrieve?
perl -MCPAN -e install Storable
perldoc Storable
On Feb 2, 2005, at 12:28 AM, Perrin Harkins wrote:
Yes, you put any object in Apache::Session as long as it can be
handled by Stora
jonathan vanasco wrote:
is there any way to store an object into an Apache Session ?
Yes, you put any object in Apache::Session as long as it can be handled
by Storable. You'll need to tell us what you tried and what didn't work
about it before we can help you more.
- Perrin
On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 23:52 -0500, jonathan vanasco wrote:
> slightly OT, but i'm doing this in mod_perl!
>
> server
> Apache/2.0.52 (Unix)
> mod_perl/1.99_16
> Perl/v5.8.1
>
> use
> use Apache::Cookie;
> use Apache::Request ();
> use Apache::Session;
> u
slightly OT, but i'm doing this in mod_perl!
server
Apache/2.0.52 (Unix)
mod_perl/1.99_16
Perl/v5.8.1
use
use Apache::Cookie;
use Apache::Request ();
use Apache::Session;
use Apache::Session::File;
is there any way to store an object into an A
Robert Landrum wrote:
I'm having a bit of trouble with a 64 bit versions of perl and apache
not playing nice with 32 bit shared objects under linux.
We have an external shared object binary supplied by a vendor that we can
link our XS code against just fine, but when we attempt to actually us
I'm having a bit of trouble with a 64 bit versions of perl and apache
not playing nice with 32 bit shared objects under linux.
We have an external shared object binary supplied by a vendor that we can
link our XS code against just fine, but when we attempt to actually use
the shared methods,
On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 01:36 -0700, Gary C. New wrote:
> I am in the middle of a project that requires me to dynamically update
> certain default paths within the Apache Server environment.
>
> I currently am able to update document_root on the fly and now need to
> be able to update php_value in
I am in the middle of a project that requires me to dynamically update
certain default paths within the Apache Server environment.
I currently am able to update document_root on the fly and now need to
be able to update php_value include_path in the same manor.
Is there an existing perl module
Eric J. Hansen wrote:
Hurrah! Its working now. Thank you!
Cool. Thanks for the report.
I'll commit it after releasing 1.99_12 on Monday, so it'll be available in
1.99_13 hopefully somewhere next month. I can't add it to 1.99_12 since it
wasn't tested.
When I try to retrieve this Class::DBI ob
Hurrah! Its working now. Thank you!
Eric
> > When I try to retrieve this Class::DBI object from the Cleanup
> > Handler, the pnotes values are totally gone. However,
> regular scalers
> > that I've put in 'notes' are still there. Perhaps pnotes has (by
> > design) already been cleaned up
Eric J. Hansen wrote:
After looking at this further, it turns out that Perrin's suggested
code *does* work, but only in the PerlResponseHandler or earlier
stages. And unfortunately, I mis-stated the original problem... which is
that I am trying to retrieve that pnotes object (Class::DBI instance)
losing its namespace.
>
> That's not it. Many people have successfully stored objects
> in pnotes
> before.
>
> > In the first handler (where I define
> > the object and store it in pnotes) I'm logging the value of "ref
> > $dbrecord" an
Eric J. Hansen wrote:
On further investigation, the problem seems to be that the object
is losing its namespace.
That's not it. Many people have successfully stored objects in pnotes
before.
In the first handler (where I define
the object and store it in pnotes) I'm logging the val
at this must be the problem...
any other ideas?
thanks
Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Perrin Harkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 9:22 PM
> To: Eric J. Hansen
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: using pnotes to store/retrieve Class::DBI
Eric J. Hansen wrote:
my $dbrecord = ClassDBI_Table1->retrieve ( 1 ); # ClassDBI_Table1
is of base Class::DBI::mysql
$r->pnotes('INFO_FOR_LATER', \$dbrecord );
Should be
$r->pnotes('INFO_FOR_LATER', $dbrecord );
my $existing_dbrecord = $r->pnotes('INFO_FOR_LA
I'm trying to use $r->pnotes to store a Class::DBI object in an early
stage handler so it may be retrieved by a later stage handler. Specifically:
in my PerlTransHandler:
my $dbrecord = ClassDBI_Table1->retrieve ( 1 ); # ClassDBI_Table1 is
of base Class::DBI::mysql
$r->p
Patricio Muñoz wrote:
Hi,
I have the script
<%
$mypath = "D:\Apache\Apache2\asp\aplicacion\videos";
$fso = $Server->CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject");
$fls = $fso->GetFolder($Server->MapPath($mypath));
%>
when execute in the browser, appear the next error:
[Thu Dec 04 13:14:40 2003] [
Hi,
I have the script
<%
$mypath = "D:\Apache\Apache2\asp\aplicacion\videos";
$fso = $Server->CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject");
$fls = $fso->GetFolder($Server->MapPath($mypath));
%>
when execute in the browser, appear the next error:
[Thu Dec 04 13:14:40 2003] [error] [asp] [-98744
Hi there,
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, [iso-8859-1] Patricio Muñoz wrote:
> I don't found the examples or documentation where can make the
> convertion to Apache::ASP
Apache::ASP is purely for Perl scripting, you can't use the same
code that you would use in the M1cr0$0ft world.
There is a separate Web
Hi all,
I problem with work Objects. The next code work fine with ASP
<%
Set filesystem = CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject")
Set folder = filesystem.GetFolder(server.mappath(mypath))
Set subfolders = folder.SubFolders
Set filecollection = folder.Files
%>
n
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 13:19, Stas Bekman wrote:
> I doubt it's an Apache::DBI problem. Most likely something is borked in the
> sub-classing implementation, so you probably want to contact the author of the
> subclass.
I agree, it is probably a result of the fact that Apache::DBI does some
stran
olkit, so basically I'm storing under
Apache::DBI not 'vanilla' DBI class objects but
Extropia::Core::DataSource::DBI class objects (which directly extend DBI
class).
The error I catch is:
[error] undef error - Undefined subroutine &Apache::DBI::db::quote
called at /A
y I'm storing under
Apache::DBI not 'vanilla' DBI class objects but
Extropia::Core::DataSource::DBI class objects (which directly extend DBI
class).
The error I catch is:
[error] undef error - Undefined subroutine &Apache::DBI::db::quote
called at /ADT/Modules/Extropia/Core/Dat
On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 07:06, harm wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 03:19:25PM -0400, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 14:56, Brendan W. McAdams wrote:
> > > Tried timestamping the second layer, and saving directly, no luck.
> >
> > The timestamp has to be in the first layer. It doe
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 03:19:25PM -0400, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 14:56, Brendan W. McAdams wrote:
> > Tried timestamping the second layer, and saving directly, no luck.
>
> The timestamp has to be in the first layer. It doesn't have to be a
> timestamp, actually. Any write
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 14:56, Brendan W. McAdams wrote:
> Tried timestamping the second layer, and saving directly, no luck.
The timestamp has to be in the first layer. It doesn't have to be a
timestamp, actually. Any write at all in the first layer is fine, e.g.
$session{'changed'} = 1.
I forgo
e, just a blessed hash
> > inside) within Apache::Session. I'm doing this:
> > $session->{tax_swap}->{preview_sell_candidates} = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> > where @items is an array of SellCandidate objects... I've stored array
> > references in Apache::Session before; is
Hi Brendan,
> I'm trying to store an object (simple datatype, just a blessed hash
> inside) within Apache::Session. I'm doing this:
> $session->{tax_swap}->{preview_sell_candidates} = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> where @items is an array of SellCandidate objects... I
I also should note that the following subroutine works:
# Persists sell candidates to session storage
# Should take an array of
Apache::MuniCenter::MarkupMatrix::TaxSwap::Candidate Objects
# Should this be redone as an object (Yes, but question is when..)
sub savePreviewSellList {
my
I'm trying to store an object (simple datatype, just a blessed hash
inside) within Apache::Session. I'm doing this:
$session->{tax_swap}->{preview_sell_candidates} = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
where @items is an array of SellCandidate objects... I've stored array
references in Apach
96 matches
Mail list logo
