The word is 'pretty soon'. We're working out some of the release
issues that slowed down the last release.
You can always pull from subversion trunk and test with that version
to see if it resolves the issue you are seeing.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Hans Scharler wrote:
> Any word on the
Any word on the release of mod_perl 2.0.6?
I will be glad to test to see if it solves the Apache restart issue when a
client stops the browser.
Thanks,
Hans
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Fred Moyer wrote:
> You might try pulling and building from svn trunk, Steve Hay fixed
> something that
You might try pulling and building from svn trunk, Steve Hay fixed
something that may be related. I don't have enough WinFoo to say for
sure. Or wait another 4-6 weeks for 2.0.6.
http://perl.apache.org/download/source.html
=item 2.0.6-dev
PerlIOApache_flush() and mpxs_Apache2__RequestRec_rflus
Yes, the entire process restarts.
Here is the exact line:
ModPerl::Util::exit: (12) exit was called at
D:/InterfaceServer/Perl/lib/CGI/Carp.pm line 561
[Sun May 29 05:25:10 2011] [notice] Parent: child process exited with status
255 -- Restarting.
It's a notice.
I did some further testing a
Hans,
> ModPerl::Util::exit: (12) exit was called at
> D:/InterfaceServer/Perl/lib/CGI/Carp.pm line 561
> Parent: child process exited with status 255 -- Restarting.
I have done a lot of testing on windows with the 2.05 release and have not
seen this error before. It must be something specifi
wrote:
> >
> > > Thank you so much for the new release!
> > >
> > > Jie
> > >
> > > Please think of our environment and only print this e-mail if
> necessary.
> > >
> > > * Andr? Warnier wrote:
> > >
> > > >
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Randolf Richardson wrote:
> It's interesting to know that auto-generated code is a problem, and
> this is providing me with some insight into why some DBIx::Class
> users have been telling me that mod_perl (all versions) is so
> terrible (I didn't experience
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Randolf Richardson wrote:
> It's interesting to know that auto-generated code is a problem, and
> this is providing me with some insight into why some DBIx::Class
> users have been telling me that mod_perl (all versions) is so
> terrible (I didn't experience
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Thomas den Braber wrote:
>
> > On linux I also had never any problem with Reload. But on Linux I always
> > run Apache with prefork MPM (I have not tested with Worker MPM on Linux
> > yet), on Windows there is only Worker MPM, can there be a relation between
> >
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Thomas den Braber wrote:
> On linux I also had never any problem with Reload. But on Linux I always
> run Apache with prefork MPM (I have not tested with Worker MPM on Linux
> yet), on Windows there is only Worker MPM, can there be a relation between
> the reload p
> This is only happening to me on Windows though too, and just hasn't
> been a problem under NetBSD running the same versions of Apache
> HTTPd, APR, and Perl (although on the Windows side we're using
> ActivePerl so perhaps that's a better culprit since NetBSD is using
> Perl from pkgsr
> The only other times I can recall where I've experienced this
> crashing is with the Apache2::Upload module, or with the
> Image::Magick (PerlMagick) module (there are only a few instances
> where I'm not using these two together). Even for test scripts where
> I don't use "use base" a
> On 02/11/2011 12:02 PM, Randolf Richardson wrote:
>
> >> I use reload all the time it worked OK for most modules but some modules
> >> (at least the ones that use "use base 'modulename';" ) will have problems.
> >
> > That's very interesting because where I'm seeing the crashing
> > usually
On 02/11/2011 12:02 PM, Randolf Richardson wrote:
I use reload all the time it worked OK for most modules but some modules
(at least the ones that use "use base 'modulename';" ) will have problems.
That's very interesting because where I'm seeing the crashing
usually involves code that
[sNip]
> > I find that running ModPerl on Windows generally works well until
> > Perl scripts are changed frequently (and using the Reload module),
> > and then Apache HTTPd will either stop responding or just crash out
> > (especially if PerlMagick is in the mix). I wonder if this might be
> Has anyone tried 2.0.5 on Windows?
Yes I have compiled it with VC2010 and Activestate Perl 5.10.1 Build 1007.
It works fine I have worked with it for a couple of days now.
I have tested with Windows XP, Windows 7 and Windows 2003 all working fine.
> I find that running ModPerl on Window
* Randolf Richardson wrote:
> Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 19:22:06 -0800
> From: Randolf Richardson
> To: mod_perl Dev ,
> mod_perl list
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_perl 2.0.5
> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.52)
>
> > Awesome everyone. Thanks for wo
rnier wrote:
> >
> > > Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:18:33 +0100
> > > From: Andr? Warnier
> > > To: mod_perl Dev
> > > CC: mod_perl list
> > > Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_perl 2.0.5
> > > User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
> &
int this e-mail if necessary.
>
> * Andr? Warnier wrote:
>
> > Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:18:33 +0100
> > From: Andr? Warnier
> > To: mod_perl Dev
> > CC: mod_perl list
> > Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_perl 2.0.5
> > User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0
Thank you so much for the new release!
Jie
Please think of our environment and only print this e-mail if necessary.
* Andr? Warnier wrote:
> Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:18:33 +0100
> From: Andr? Warnier
> To: mod_perl Dev
> CC: mod_perl list
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_pe
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Clinton Gormley wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 17:55 -0800, Fred Moyer wrote:
>> mod_perl 2.0.5 is here!
>
> Well done! and thanks
Thanks to the users who took the time to try out release candidates,
fix and report bugs.
Saw this today - word is getting out about
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 17:55 -0800, Fred Moyer wrote:
> mod_perl 2.0.5 is here!
Well done! and thanks
clint
Many thanks guys, for keeping mod_perl alive and well (and perl too for that
matter).
It is really a pity that not more people know how much their nice web applications depend
on it.
But then, maybe we should think that the people who matter, do know.
23 matches
Mail list logo
