Geoffrey Young wrote:
the mod_perl development team is pleased to announce that we have a new
candidate for mod_perl 2.0, ready and waiting for testers.
[...]
Looks like things are borked on OS X ;-(
Darwin (OS X):
Static: bus error on startup (will investigate)
Dynamic:
worker & prefork:
On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 19:20 -0400, jonathan vanasco wrote:
> standard perl â that is one thing i never want to compile on my own
You may want to try it some day. It's a very easy compile, and on
systems like Fedora you can get about 15% better speed by compiling it
yourself with all the defaults.
On Apr 11, 2005, at 7:09 PM, jonathan vanasco wrote:
i fear that i'm going to want backport to RC4 soon...
and so I have!
I need to spend my time right now developing this webapp i've been
slaving on - i'm gonna hold off on RC5 until there's a libaprq release
for it
Thanks to everyone who chimed
jonathan vanasco wrote:
On Apr 11, 2005, at 7:16 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
perl with or without ithreads
apr with threads
worker or prefork mpm?
standard perl – that is one thing i never want to compile on my own
a
perl -V ?
--
END
--
Philip
On Apr 11, 2005, at 7:16 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
perl with or without ithreads
apr with threads
worker or prefork mpm?
standard perl – that is one thing i never want to compile on my own
apr seems to have APR_USE_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE
httpd is prefork_mpm
did i choose the wrong stuff for apache?
jonathan vanasco wrote:
multi-env-unstable
t/logs/error_log says:
END in modperl_extra.pl, pid=5152
Attempt to free unreferenced scalar at
/System/Library/Perl/5.8.1/Test/Harness.pm line 31.
t/logs/error_log says:
END in modperl_extra.pl, pid=5152
Attempt to free unreferenced scal
multi-env-unstable
i fear that i'm going to want backport to RC4 soon...
I keep getting this error on the 'make test'
osx 10.3.8
perl Makefile.PL APXS=/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs
(mp1 worked fine)
waiting 120 seconds for server to start: .[Mon Apr 11 19:06:00 2005]
[info] 6 Apache2:: modules lo
jonathan vanasco wrote:
does anyone know if libaprq needs to be rebuilt? or will it work ?
No it will not.
You'll need to for the time being check it out via SVN, but not the
trunk, the branch multi-env-unstable. I just compiled it and made it
all the way. I've done much tests yet... But I'll g
On Apr 11, 2005, at 12:34 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
find /usr/lib/perl5 | grep Apache2 | xargs rm -rf
find /usr/lib/perl5 -name 'Apache2' -exec rm -rf {} \;
adjust /usr/lib/perl5 to point to the root of your perl lib.
be careful though when you do 'rm -rf' :)
if anyone gets paranoid, you can always ju
On Monday 11 April 2005 16:05, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/rename.html
Does that mean that new modules working only with MP2 should better be named
Apache2::...?
I think, yes.
Torsten
pgpTsR65rJ130.pgp
Description: PGP signature
hi all,
-- On April 11, 2005 1:44:12 PM -0400 "Philip M. Gollucci"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2.1 without issue, and I think there are several over on dev@ that are doing
That'd be me... I'm using 2.1.5-dev w/ mp2
fwiw, today's HEAD looks OK on my OSX 10.3.8 dev-box ...
Server Version: Apache/2.1
2.1 without issue, and I think there are several over on dev@ that are doing
That'd be me... I'm using 2.1.5-dev w/ mp2
Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
On Apr 11, 2005, at 10:05 AM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
*** YOU WILL NEED TO MODIFY ALL YOUR CODE AFTER UPGRADING ***
Is there going to be another one of these for mod_perl under Apache2.1 ?
I don't think so... The most radically different thing is the auth modules
and that i
Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
>
> On Apr 11, 2005, at 10:05 AM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
>> *** YOU WILL NEED TO MODIFY ALL YOUR CODE AFTER UPGRADING ***
>
>
> Is there going to be another one of these for mod_perl under Apache2.1 ?
not likely, but don't confuse the issue - really, the code migra
On Apr 11, 2005, at 10:05 AM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
*** YOU WILL NEED TO MODIFY ALL YOUR CODE AFTER UPGRADING ***
Is there going to be another one of these for mod_perl under Apache2.1 ?
Stas Bekman wrote:
Adam Prime x443 wrote:
Assuming i was upgrading a machine running RC4 to RC5, what is the
easiest way to remove RC4 so RC5 will install?
make uninstall in the old build directory says it's depreciated
(looking at the makefile), but offers no automated alternative? Will
it do the
Adam Prime x443 wrote:
Assuming i was upgrading a machine running RC4 to RC5, what is the
easiest way to remove RC4 so RC5 will install?
make uninstall in the old build directory says it's depreciated
(looking at the makefile), but offers no automated alternative? Will
it do the job or do I really
Assuming i was upgrading a machine running RC4 to RC5, what is the easiest way
to remove RC4 so RC5 will install?
make uninstall in the old build directory says it's depreciated (looking at the
makefile), but offers no automated alternative? Will it do the job or do I
really need to go throu
18 matches
Mail list logo
