On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Philip M. Gollucci
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW: For what its worth, Stas and someone where workign on DBI::Pool,
> but gave up.
>
> See Also, httpd's mod_dbd and mod_dbd_mysql which would be cool to get
> some perl bindings for.
If anyone actually needs a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Perrin Harkins wrote:
| On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Slinky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> I'm making use of the two to maintain a pool of connections to Oracle.
|
| Well, you're not really. :)
| Apache::DBI doesn't do what most people would consi
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Slinky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm making use of the two to maintain a pool of connections to Oracle.
Well, you're not really. :)
Apache::DBI doesn't do what most people would consider "pooling" since
sharing connections between processes is not possible. It
Slinky wrote:
Want I'd like to know is, is there a way to limit the size of the pool? I've
skimmed the Apache::DBI source, and I mean "skimmed" but nothing obvious hit
me... It's not really a problem with prod because SESSIONS_PER_USER is a
decent figure, but it would be mightily useful for dev.