On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 14:25, Dodger wrote:
> All I have to go on is the documentation, which is noticably sparse in this
> area
You're welcome to improve it. NPH is not really a standard, just a
common practice, and it's mostly irrelevant for mod_perl since you have
complete control over your out
- Original Message -
From: "Perrin Harkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dodger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Modperl List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 10:52 AM
Subject: Re: Autoflush without NPH...
> On Fri, 200
Perrin Harkins wrote:
[...]
Technically, all mod_perl
handlers and any Apache::Registry script run with PerlSendHeader off is
equivalent to an NPH script.
BTW, that's true only for Apache 1.3. Apache 2.0 will force its own headers
sending unless you set $r->assbackwards(1);, which is done automati
On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 13:37, Dodger wrote:
> Now, as long as PerlSendHeader is*On* will that make sure that it does NOT
> run as an NPH script if $! is set to 1?
Do you understand what an NPH script is? It simply means that the
server is not parsing your output and adding headers, the way it
norm
