Le mercredi 07 mars 2012 à 17:06 +0100, Torsten Förtsch a écrit :
Hi Torsten,
> On Tuesday, 28 February 2012 18:14:20 Vincent Veyron wrote:
> your post has me very worried that it could end in a
> > hurry
>
> So am I and so are many (perhaps most) of the other contributors.
Perrin was a bit mo
On Tuesday, 28 February 2012 18:14:20 Vincent Veyron wrote:
> I am a tiny one-man company using mod_perl with great success(*) and
> pleasure, and your post has me very worried that it could end in a
> hurry
So am I and so are many (perhaps most) of the other contributors. What I am
trying to say
On 29 Feb 2012, at 19:33, Dan Axtell wrote:
>
> Basically I want to have various virtual hosts be reverse proxied to various
> back end servers (e.g. mod_perl for some legacy apps, a Catalyst app under
> fast CGI). I tried this with Nginx and it all seemed to work but what I
> discovered is
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Dan Axtell wrote:
> Basically I want to have various virtual hosts be reverse proxied to various
> back end servers (e.g. mod_perl for some legacy apps, a Catalyst app under
> fast CGI). I tried this with Nginx and it all seemed to work but what I
> discovered is
>
> There's also a talk I gave a couple of years ago about non-plack
> options, like nginx+fastcgi:
> http://elem.com/~perrin/web_arch.pdf.gz
>
Thanks for posting this. I understand the general idea of having a
lightweight server on port 80 to handle static content and reverse proxying to
ano
Le mardi 28 février 2012 à 17:27 -0500, Perrin Harkins a écrit :
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Jan Dubois wrote:
> > I find this talk an excellent overview of all the different ways to
> > deploy Perl (PSGI) applications:
> >
> > http://www.slideshare.net/miyagawa/deploying-plack-web-applicat
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Jan Dubois wrote:
> I find this talk an excellent overview of all the different ways to
> deploy Perl (PSGI) applications:
>
> http://www.slideshare.net/miyagawa/deploying-plack-web-applications-oscon-2011-8706659
There's also a talk I gave a couple of years ago a
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Vincent Veyron wrote:
> Le mardi 28 février 2012 à 13:46 -0500, Perrin Harkins a écrit :
>
> > Even if mod_perl someday stops being developed for new versions of
> > perl and apache, there will be no immediate need to move off it and
> > plenty of alternatives available.
>
> Do
Le mardi 28 février 2012 à 13:46 -0500, Perrin Harkins a écrit :
> Even if mod_perl someday stops being developed for new versions of
> perl and apache, there will be no immediate need to move off it and
> plenty of alternatives available.
>
Do you think nginx+perl could be one of those alternat
> 2012/2/28 Vincent Veyron :
> > I am a tiny one-man company using mod_perl with great success(*) and
> > pleasure, and your post has me very worried that it could end in a
> > hurry :-(
I depend on mod_perl2 for nearly all the web sites that I maintain,
and I've been trying to encourage
2012/2/28 Vincent Veyron :
> I am a tiny one-man company using mod_perl with great success(*) and
> pleasure, and your post has me very worried that it could end in a
> hurry :-(
Don't panic! There's no immediate danger to mod_perl, and most people
are not trying to run on the very latest version
11 matches
Mail list logo
