Re: HTML::Template::Compiled

2005-09-15 Thread Tina Mueller
hi, On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Octavian Rasnita wrote: > Does anyone use the templating system HTML::Template::Compiled with > mod_perl? > > I have just discovered that it works much faster with mod_perl than > HTML::Template and I have also seen that it has some new features but I > wouldn't like to

Re: HTML::Template::Compiled

2005-08-30 Thread Octavian Rasnita
;Perrin Harkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Octavian Rasnita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 11:10 PM Subject: Re: HTML::Template::Compiled > On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, jonathan vanasco wrote: > > > 2- even the slowest templating option - petal - w

Re: HTML::Template::Compiled

2005-08-30 Thread Sam Tregar
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Jonathan Vanasco wrote: > are there any worries for security overflows / memory leaks, having compiled > that stuff into c or xs (its one of those, right?) under mod_perl Sure, it's worth worrying about. Anything written in C can potentially have a buffer-overflow bug or a m

Re: HTML::Template::Compiled

2005-08-30 Thread Jonathan Vanasco
I've got a question about the Compiled/JIT stuff: are there any worries for security overflows / memory leaks, having compiled that stuff into c or xs (its one of those, right?) under mod_perl a friend brought that up with me, and i don't know what to answer under regular perl, that stuff wo

Re: HTML::Template::Compiled

2005-08-30 Thread Sam Tregar
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, jonathan vanasco wrote: > 2- even the slowest templating option - petal - was a fraction of > the speed of my business logic and db connectivity This is an important point, and it's the main reason I've never actually used HTML::Template::JIT. My ego demanded that I create t

Re: HTML::Template::Compiled

2005-08-30 Thread Octavian Rasnita
From: "Perrin Harkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > No. However, I have spoken with the author about it a bit. Depending on > your use, it seems that HTML::Template::JIT may be a bit faster, and has a > decent test suite, which might ease your mind. It is more compatible with > HTML::Template. Howeve

Re: HTML::Template::Compiled

2005-08-29 Thread jonathan vanasco
On Aug 29, 2005, at 10:50 PM, Perrin Harkins wrote: No. However, I have spoken with the author about it a bit. Depending on your use, it seems that HTML::Template::JIT may be a bit faster, and has a decent test suite, which might ease your mind. It is more compatible with HTML::Templat

Re: HTML::Template::Compiled

2005-08-29 Thread Perrin Harkins
Octavian Rasnita said: > Does anyone use the templating system HTML::Template::Compiled with > mod_perl? No. However, I have spoken with the author about it a bit. Depending on your use, it seems that HTML::Template::JIT may be a bit faster, and has a decent test suite, which might ease your min