Re: RH9.0, httpd-2.0.40-21.i386.rpm, perl-5.9.0

2003-12-05 Thread Stas Bekman
Phil Rhoades wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_perl-1.99_11]# perl Makefile.PL MP_APXS=/usr/local/ apache2/bin/apxs Reading Makefile.PL args from @ARGV MP_APXS = /usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs Configuring Apache/2.0.48 mod_perl/1.99_11 Perl/v5.9.0 *** configuration file /usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_p

Re: RH9.0, httpd-2.0.40-21.i386.rpm, perl-5.9.0

2003-12-05 Thread Stas Bekman
Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: 5.9.0 is broken. mod_perl won't support it. Please don't use it. Wait for 5.9.1, or use a fresh bleadperl, if you want the shiny new features. Or use 5.8.2. __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH --> Just An

Re: RH9.0, httpd-2.0.40-21.i386.rpm, perl-5.9.0

2003-12-05 Thread Rafael Garcia-Suarez
Ged Haywood wrote: > > Hello again Phil, > > On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Phil Rhoades wrote: > > > modperl_perl.c:226: `PL_rehash_seed' undeclared (first use in this function) > > I think this is probably because you're using Perl 5.9.0 - if you look > at the bottom of src/modules/perl/modperl_perl.c yo

Re: RH9.0, httpd-2.0.40-21.i386.rpm, perl-5.9.0

2003-12-05 Thread Ged Haywood
Hello again Phil, On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Phil Rhoades wrote: > modperl_perl.c:226: `PL_rehash_seed' undeclared (first use in this function) I think this is probably because you're using Perl 5.9.0 - if you look at the bottom of src/modules/perl/modperl_perl.c you'll see a conditional which talks ab

Re: RH9.0, httpd-2.0.40-21.i386.rpm, perl-5.9.0

2003-12-05 Thread Phil Rhoades
Ged, On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Phil Rhoades wrote: > % perl Makefile.PL MP_APXS=/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs" > > but apxs does not exist - does that mean I have to remove the > apache rpm and build apache from src as well? Yes. If for no other reason than that you should ensure that Apache and mod_p

Re: RH9.0, httpd-2.0.40-21.i386.rpm, perl-5.9.0

2003-12-05 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi there, On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Phil Rhoades wrote: > % perl Makefile.PL MP_APXS=/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs" > > but apxs does not exist - does that mean I have to remove the apache > rpm and build apache from src as well? Yes. If for no other reason than that you should ensure that Apache an