Re: mod_perl 2.0.0 + Apache 2.0.55 on Cygwin Win2k3

+ Apache 2.0.55 on Cygwin Win2k3 Let me make this CLEAR please.Activestate perl, or any other perl/mod_perl/Apache that I found for windows fails under any load with zero error messages in any of the log files.  I need to do some sort of trace or something to get any real info for you

Re: mod_perl 2.0.0 + Apache 2.0.55 on Cygwin Win2k3

PM Subject: Re: mod_perl 2.0.0 + Apache 2.0.55 on Cygwin Win2k3 Note what I left in this reply... I suppose I should of been more explicit in what I tried. AcriveState perl fails quicker then perl.org perl binaries that I found.On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 10:43 +0800, Foo Ji-Haw wrote

Re: mod_perl 2.0.0 + Apache 2.0.55 on Cygwin Win2k3

e, it's mostly for commercial purposes, and less an administrative tool. I love it! - Original Message - From: Mark Galbreath To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: modperl@perl.apache.org Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 9:47 PM Subject: Re: mod

Re: mod_perl 2.0.0 + Apache 2.0.55 on Cygwin Win2k3

Excellent!  Coding perl (this makes content relevant) allow you to ski Whistler/Blackcomb? >>> Tyler MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16-Feb-06 09:56:51 AM >>> Mark Galbreath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> No, I'm saying modules that have been upgraded to 8.7 may no longer work> in a 5.6 envirnoment. 

Re: mod_perl 2.0.0 + Apache 2.0.55 on Cygwin Win2k3

Let me make this CLEAR please. Activestate perl, or any other perl/mod_perl/Apache that I found for windows fails under any load with zero error messages in any of the log files.  I need to do some sort of trace or something to get any real info for you developers, this I know. But in the mean

Re: mod_perl 2.0.0 + Apache 2.0.55 on Cygwin Win2k3

Mark Galbreath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, I'm saying modules that have been upgraded to 8.7 may no longer work > in a 5.6 envirnoment. Mine didn't. Ahh. I'd upgrade to 5.8 in that case. ;-) > Way cool. Where (geographically) ru? Vancouver, BC, Canada. - T

Re: mod_perl 2.0.0 + Apache 2.0.55 on Cygwin Win2k3

No, I'm saying modules that have been upgraded to 8.7 may no longer work in a 5.6 envirnoment.  Mine didn't.   Way cool.  Where (geographically) ru?>>> Tyler MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16-Feb-06 08:56:17 AM >>     I'm kind-of confused here... are you saying that activeperl 8xxbuilds don't have

Re: mod_perl 2.0.0 + Apache 2.0.55 on Cygwin Win2k3

Note what I left in this reply... I suppose I should of been more explicit in what I tried. AcriveState perl fails quicker then perl.org perl binaries that I found. On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 10:43 +0800, Foo Ji-Haw wrote:  Why don't you try ActivePerl instead of cygwin ?

Re: mod_perl 2.0.0 + Apache 2.0.55 on Cygwin Win2k3

Mark Galbreath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At the office, installing ActivePerl just annoyed the sysadmins because it > didn't really break anything but I found myself in the position of begin > able to take advantage of some pretty cool modules (like IO::ALL, e.g.) > that have been upgraded or de

Re: mod_perl 2.0.0 + Apache 2.0.55 on Cygwin Win2k3

> > At the office, installing ActivePerl just annoyed the sysadmins > because it didn't really break anything but I found myself in the > position of begin able to take advantage of some pretty cool modules > (like IO::ALL, e.g.) that have been upgraded or designed for 5.8 when > the infrastruct

Re: mod_perl 2.0.0 + Apache 2.0.55 on Cygwin Win2k3

A word of caution from personal experience here.   First, I love ActiveState' s stuff - I bought (out of my pocket) personal and pro licenses for Komodo 3.2 and 3.5.  I run ActivePerl 5.8 and ActivePython 2.4 on my Winblows and Linux boxes at home.  So what's the prob?   At the office, installing

Re: mod_perl 2.0.0 + Apache 2.0.55 on Cygwin Win2k3

It's free ;-) http://www.activestate.com/ Tom Jeff Pang wrote: >> Why don't you try ActivePerl instead of cygwin ? > > Is there any free version of ActivePerl£¿or how much should I pay for > it?thanks. > > - Original Message - > *From:* Jason J. Czerak

Re: mod_perl 2.0.0 + Apache 2.0.55 on Cygwin Win2k3

> Why don't you try ActivePerl instead of cygwin ?   Is there any free version of ActivePerl£¿or how much should I pay for it?thanks. - Original Message - From: Jason J. Czerak To: modperl@perl.apache.org Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 4:28 AM Subject: mod_perl 2.0.0 + Apache 2.

Re: mod_perl 2.0.0 + Apache 2.0.55 on Cygwin Win2k3

 Why don't you try ActivePerl instead of cygwin ? - Original Message - From: Jason J. Czerak To: modperl@perl.apache.org Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 4:28 AM Subject: mod_perl 2.0.0 + Apache 2.0.55 on Cygwin Win2k3 I have an application that is based on Apa