Geoffrey Young wrote:
[...] in the meanwhile I'll see if I can't
prototype a perl interface for killing both processes and interpreters.
I'd suggest discussing this before spending any time prototyping things. I
can't quite see how are you going to kill interpreters and how are you going
to make
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Sat, 2003-11-22 at 16:46, Stas Bekman wrote:
This week at ApacheCon in Las Vegas, Geoff, Philippe and I sat down and
created a new TODO list:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/modperl-2.0/todo/release?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/plain
which contains issues we
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Sun, 2003-11-23 at 03:59, Stas Bekman wrote:
It's all yours now ;) I'll handle the GTopLimit, unless someone wants to
handle it. May be we should merge the two and have an option to use GTopLimit
if that's available and other approaches if it is not?
Sure, I can look a
On Sun, 2003-11-23 at 03:59, Stas Bekman wrote:
> It's all yours now ;) I'll handle the GTopLimit, unless someone wants to
> handle it. May be we should merge the two and have an option to use GTopLimit
> if that's available and other approaches if it is not?
Sure, I can look at integrating them
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Sat, 2003-11-22 at 16:46, Stas Bekman wrote:
This week at ApacheCon in Las Vegas, Geoff, Philippe and I sat down and
created a new TODO list:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/modperl-2.0/todo/release?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/plain
which contains issues we th
On Sat, 2003-11-22 at 16:46, Stas Bekman wrote:
> This week at ApacheCon in Las Vegas, Geoff, Philippe and I sat down and
> created a new TODO list:
> http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/modperl-2.0/todo/release?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/plain
> which contains issues we think must be res
