I thought the subject was very descriptive - as it's a problem with
mod_perl-2, which only exists, when using it with apache-2.2.
On Mon, October 16, 2006 16:08, gerard such said:
> Is the subject "mod_perl-2 and apache-2.2 problem" really appropriate?
> I've
> jus
Is the subject "mod_perl-2 and apache-2.2 problem" really appropriate? I've just being searching through the mailing list recently and there a good subject is really appreciated.
2006/10/16, Klavs Klavsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Mon, October 16, 2006 10:18, Philip M. Gollucci
On Mon, October 16, 2006 10:18, Philip M. Gollucci said:
[SNIP]
>> I would like to know if this patch (if it works) is going to be part of
>> a
>> 2.0.3 release?
> Yes, it was committed Mar 9, 2006, 12:19 PM
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=384596
>
> I'll hopefully have some tim
this one time in band camp Klavs Klavsen said on 10/16/06 01:09:
Hi Guys,
I've been testing mod_perl-2.0.2 with Apache-2.2.0 and have found a
problem with the perlsection configuration for apache - which I'm very
reliant on (use it for developers, where it automagically configures the
server for
Hi Guys,
I've been testing mod_perl-2.0.2 with Apache-2.2.0 and have found a
problem with the perlsection configuration for apache - which I'm very
reliant on (use it for developers, where it automagically configures the
server for the developer).
The problem is, that it does not like ExecCGI any
