Just a thought: is install ap22 + mp2 + libapreq2 via pkg_add -r an
option? That's what I normally do these days.
Adam Prime wrote:
You guys might want to take a look at this thread on apreq-dev
http://marc.info/?t=12420765987&r=1&w=2
Specifically the last couple of posts from pgollucci
pkg_add -r just goes to a package repository and gets a package version
thats allready complied for your distribution. So you can't build your
options.
However this apreq2.12 issue is interesting. I was going to try this
again. I went to build this port but make errored out with:
===>
This may be completely unrelated, but I had similar headaches installing
libapreq2 on a 64 bit machine that had both 32 and 64 bit libs installed. I
had to uninstall the offending 32 bit libs (which I didn't need).
Do they have a similar setup?
Dimitri
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Sin wro
When I build from ports the " make config " usually brings up a window that has
options for both 32 bit and 64 bit. If I had to guess I'd say its the same
Makefile and source code that builds the binary files. Or in your case a 64
bit bin file. But honestly I really don't know, we should s
The man you want at the FreeBSD lists is Philip M. Gollucci.
He maintains libapreq2 in the ports collection, and was very
helpful to me when I was trying to get the module to build,
earlier this year.
Good Luck and please report your results to this list when this is
settled,
cmac
On Oct 30,
remove my email from list.
Thanks and regards,
Sudhakar Avirneni,
ph)6786228961
> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:48:05 -0400
> Subject: Re: mod-perl child process
> From: phark...@gmail.com
> To: raja.kulaseka...@netapp.com
> CC: modperl@perl.apache.org
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Kula
As a side note, my problems were on CentOS. But the errors were similar ...
Dimitri
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Sin wrote:
> When I build from ports the " make config " usually brings up a window
> that has options for both 32 bit and 64 bit. If I had to guess I'd say its
> the same M
