Re: WELCOME to modperl@perl.apache.org

Hello List, I'm sending this message to know if there are some hints/tips to help with the problem we're facing. The problem is that for a same query repeated over time, reply time can be as short as 5ms and as long as 1s. Since there is neither correlation with CPU load or RAM usage, nor with

Recommended Linux distribution for LAMP/mod_perl

I've been trying to migrate a site with a lot of Perl legacy code running under Apache 2.2 and mod_perl. The server I was migrating to uses CentOS 7, and the default Apache 2.4 and perl 5.16 seem unusually difficult to configure. I'm not even able to get CGI scripts to run. In the past I've

Re: Recommended Linux distribution for LAMP/mod_perl

You're going to be better off with Debian than you will be with CentOS because Debian actually ships with precompiled mod_perl packages. On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 1:08 PM, daniel.axtell wrote: > I've been trying to migrate a site with a lot of Perl legacy code running > under Apache 2.2 and mod_per

Re: Recommended Linux distribution for LAMP/mod_perl

On 10/03/2016 01:09 PM, John Dunlap wrote: > You're going to be better off with Debian than you will be with CentOS > because Debian actually ships with precompiled mod_perl packages. > manjaro with openrc > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 1:08 PM, daniel.axtell > wrote: >

Re: Recommended Linux distribution for LAMP/mod_perl

We tend to now use Ubuntu LTS set ups for our webservers - currently a mix of 12.04, 14.04 and 16.04 depening on which part of the production cycle we are on (yes we have at least 60 for approx 120 different websites)... On 03/10/2016 18:09, John Dunlap wrote: You're going to be better off wi

If building from source

Thanks for all the suggestions about Linux distributions. If I do go the build from source route, is there a preferred Perl version to use in conjunction with mod_perl 2.0.9 and Apache 2.4? Is 5.20 the sweet spot? Dan

Re: If building from source

I can only tell you what I use: Debian 8 ships with Apache 2.4 and perl 5.20.2 and it seems to work for me. On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 1:41 PM, daniel.axtell wrote: > Thanks for all the suggestions about Linux distributions. > > If I do go the build from source route, is there a preferred Perl vers

Re: If building from source

If you're using 2.0.9, then the highest you can go is 5.20. RC1 for mod_perl 2.0.10 is in voting right now, if that goes out (which it should "soon"), then you should probably run 5.24 and 2.0.10. Adam On 16-10-03 01:41 PM, daniel.axtell wrote: Thanks for all the suggestions about Linux dis

Re: Recommended Linux distribution for LAMP/mod_perl

We went through a bit of an tricky patch when Ubuntu prematurely switched from Apache 2.2 to 2.4 (with major changes needed for mod_perl to work), like 6-12months before it was ready. But otherwise, I have not had any major issues with ubuntu and apache/mod_perl. *Lathan Bidwell*Web Programmer

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] mod_perl-2.0.10 RC1

In message <20161002121236.gb14...@inforich.ucc.usyd.edu.au>, Jie Gao writes: >Using httpd-2.4.23: > ># lsb_release -a >LSB Version: >:base-4.0-amd64:base-4.0-noarch:core-4.0-amd64:core-4.0-noarch:graphics-4.0-amd64:graphics-4.0-noarch:printing-4.0-amd64:printing-4.0-noarch >Distributor ID: Re

Re: WELCOME to modperl@perl.apache.org

Hi and welcome indeed. Maybe one thing first : when posting to the list, do not just hit "reply" on a message that you received previously. Create a *new* message, with a subject corresponding to what you are asking. Then later, when someone responds, you can "reply" and keep the subject ident

Re: Recommended Linux distribution for LAMP/mod_perl

On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 17:08:09 + (UTC) " daniel.axtell" wrote: > I'm curious if people here find a particular Linux distribution Perl and > mod_perl friendly 7 years of using Debian stable without any problem. > > Should I just assume building everything in the LAMP stack from source is the