Re: jim's design

2000-06-18 Thread Stas Bekman
On Sun, 18 Jun 2000, brian moseley wrote: > On Sun, 18 Jun 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: > > > * Parts from index.html have been killed > > (jobs/stats/lately added material) > > besides jobs and stats, what else? if you can figure out a > date for the recent material, i can re-apply the patches > f

Re: jim's design

2000-06-18 Thread brian moseley
On Sun, 18 Jun 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: > * Parts from index.html have been killed > (jobs/stats/lately added material) besides jobs and stats, what else? if you can figure out a date for the recent material, i can re-apply the patches from cvs by hand. > * The navbar on the other pages is brok

Re: jim's design

2000-06-18 Thread Stas Bekman
On Sun, 18 Jun 2000, brian moseley wrote: > > .. is ready to go. i can go ahead and update index.html, and > jim's also updated several of the pages linked from there. > but some of the others haven't been updated - should i do > them all, or should i just do index.html and see what people > thi

Re: jim's design

2000-06-18 Thread Eric Cholet
On Sun, Jun 18, 2000 at 03:02:25AM -0700, brian moseley wrote: > > .. is ready to go. i can go ahead and update index.html, and > jim's also updated several of the pages linked from there. > but some of the others haven't been updated - should i do > them all, or should i just do index.html and s