Hi all!
In regards to the previous discussion about trimming down CPAN and finding
better ways to find quality modules, I got an idea of making CPAN category
reviews. The idea was originally derived from Freshmeat.net where they often
have category reviews of the various software hosted there:
On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 14:02 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Hi all!
In regards to the previous discussion about trimming down CPAN and finding
I don't think trimming is necessary if you are successful with this.
IMO the problem is just finding things, which your proposal addresses.
better ways
Hi!
Thanks for your email.
On Saturday 05 April 2008, Guy Hulbert wrote:
On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 14:02 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Hi all!
In regards to the previous discussion about trimming down CPAN and
finding
I don't think trimming is necessary if you are successful with this.
IMO
On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 15:16 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Why do you feel my previous email was not concise or definite? I admit
coulda woulda shoulda ...
it was
a sort-of brainstorming email, but it was not too long. If you want a
this reply is even longer ;-)
one
paragraph summary then:
On Saturday 05 April 2008, Guy Hulbert wrote:
On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 15:16 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
one
paragraph summary then:
I suggest having a feed of human readable (and possibly machine
readable)
reviews of the modules in various CPAN categories, as an indication of
which
On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 16:54 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
On Saturday 05 April 2008, Guy Hulbert wrote:
On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 15:16 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
one
paragraph summary then:
I suggest having a feed of human readable (and possibly machine
readable)
reviews of the
On Apr 5, 2008, at 6:02 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Hi all!
In regards to the previous discussion about trimming down CPAN and
finding
better ways to find quality modules, I got an idea of making CPAN
category
reviews. The idea was originally derived from Freshmeat.net where
they often
have
# from Guy Hulbert
# on Saturday 05 April 2008 07:35:
My solution (new modules):
2. A small change to the PAUSE upload interface adding some optional
fields which add appropriate meta-data to CPAN.
Why add these to an interface instead of META.yml?
I use an automatic upload tool. I'm not
Every so often, an idea's like Shlomi's comes up, where we talk about
adding reviews to CPAN, or reorganizing the categories, or any number
of relatively easy-to-implement tasks. It's a good idea, but it's
focused too tightly. What we're really trying to do is not provide
reviews, but
* On Sat, Apr 05 2008, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Hi all!
In regards to the previous discussion about trimming down CPAN and finding
better ways to find quality modules, I got an idea of making CPAN category
reviews. The idea was originally derived from Freshmeat.net where they often
have
On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 09:41 -0700, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
# from Guy Hulbert
# on Saturday 05 April 2008 07:35:
My solution (new modules):
2. A small change to the PAUSE upload interface adding some optional
fields which add appropriate meta-data to CPAN.
Why add these to an interface
# from Andy Lester
# on Saturday 05 April 2008 09:57:
The focus needs to change from the
tactical (Let's have reviews) to the strategic (How do we get the
proper modules/solutions in the hands of the users that want them.)
What good is strategy in a distributed anarchy? It seems to me that
On Apr 5, 2008, at 1:27 PM, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
If you have a tactic for deploying a strategy, I would like to hear
it.
Like-minded strategists get together and deploy a single solution.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
On Apr 5, 2008, at 1:34 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Thanks for the comments. See below for my response. It will be a
rather
stream-of-consciousness thing, but I hope something can come up of it.
I've expanded my original comments here:
Hi Andy! (and all)
Thanks for the comments. See below for my response. It will be a rather
stream-of-consciousness thing, but I hope something can come up of it.
On Saturday 05 April 2008, Andy Lester wrote:
Every so often, an idea's like Shlomi's comes up, where we talk about
adding reviews
On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 13:42 -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
On Apr 5, 2008, at 1:34 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Thanks for the comments. See below for my response. It will be a
rather
stream-of-consciousness thing, but I hope something can come up of
it.
I've expanded my original comments
On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 21:34 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Anyway, I'll probably set up a wiki page about it, so we can
brain-storm more easily.
I will contribute when it's available then.
--
--gh
* On Sat, Apr 05 2008, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
It appears that our current strategy is this:
* rely on a proprietary web application for search (search.cpan.org)
I like kobesearch better. I hear the code for that is available, which
is the main reason I like it better :) I haven't actually
On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 18:02 -0500, Jonathan Rockway wrote:
I've wanted easily-available CPAN-related APIs also, so I wrote this
(with the help of brian d foy++):
http://git.jrock.us/?p=MetaCPAN.git;a=summary
This indexes the BACKPAN and CPAN and lets you ask questions like
what
version
Jonathan Rockway wrote:
* On Sat, Apr 05 2008, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
It appears that our current strategy is this:
* rely on a proprietary web application for search
(search.cpan.org)
I like kobesearch better. I hear the code for that is available,
which
is the main reason I like it
David Landgren wrote:
Gabor Szabo wrote:
As I am usually using Module::Build I did not know that a recent
version of MakeMaker
has started to support the LICENSE parameter and will include it in
the automatically
created META.yml.
That has been the case for a couple of years or so. I think it
On Saturday 05 April 2008, Andy Lester wrote:
On Apr 5, 2008, at 1:34 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Thanks for the comments. See below for my response. It will be a
rather
stream-of-consciousness thing, but I hope something can come up of it.
I've expanded my original comments here:
22 matches
Mail list logo
