Re: A question of permissions

Matt, I am perfectly willing to continue this conversation off list if you wish to, ... Yes, let's. -- Buddy

Re: A question of permissions

Matt, Either way, I doubt we'll gain much more value out of this thread, so while you're welcome to have the last word if it makes you happy, I'll be leaving it there. Okey dokey. My last word is: I'm saddened that you chose to ignore the personal message I sent you off-list. :-( It was

Re: A question of permissions

Matt, You're not funny. Please try and be more polite in future. I'm starting to suspect this has little to do with my response to Neil and is instead a personal thing between us. I'll send you a message off-list so we don't have to spam the rest of the world with the issue. :-)

Re: A question of permissions

Matt, So I was thinking, why would it complain about a non-existent permissions error if it had no idea what the module name was supposed to be in the first place? It knows the dist name. To upload Date-Easy as a dist name requires perms on Date::Easy. Then the empty provides means it

Re: A question of permissions

Neil, I only just noticed your email. PAUSE-related issues are better raised to modu...@perl.org , or you can send to both modules@ and module-authors. Okay, good tip. Thanks for redirecting this to the appropriate place. I *think* that the problem is this line in

A question of permissions

Guys, After I uploaded my new module Date::Easy a while back, I got a failure notice from PAUSE: This distribution name can only be used by users with permission for the package Date::Easy, which you do not have. No modules will be indexed. Of course, I had checked for that prior to

Re: Turning numbers into words

David, You have a hard problem to solve here. In 814 Charlemagne died - Eight fourteen In the year of our lord 814 ... - Eight hundred and fourteen In 814 cases out of 1000 the patient recovered - Eight hundred and fourteen Oh, it can never be perfect, that's for sure. My initial

Re: Turning numbers into words

Neil, How about something along the lines of Lingua::EN::WordifyNumerics? Hmmm ... you think that's better than Daniel's suggestion of Lingua::EN::Numbers::Combined? Thats what I'm leaning towards ATM. Considering just the name: Lingua::EN::Numbers::Combined I might think: * Lingua:

Re: Turning numbers into words

ether, So, I know how to turn 36 into thirty-six (Lingua::EN::Numbers) and 22 into twenty-second (ditto), and 3/4 into three quarters (Lingua::EN::Fractions) and even 1994 into nineteen ninety-four (Lingua::EN::Numbers::Years). What I actually _want_, though, is to turn In 1994, on the 22nd of

Re: Turning numbers into words

Daniel, Plus I thought it would be useful to solicit opinions on naming. :-) My suggestions: Lingua::EN::Numbers::All Lingua::EN::Numbers::Combined I'd lean towards ::Combined and allowing the user to specify what sub-functions they want to be using. (Base numbers and fractions? Years and

Re: Turning numbers into words

Neil, So, I know how to turn 36 into thirty-six (Lingua::EN::Numbers) and 22 into twenty-second (ditto), and 3/4 into three quarters (Lingua::EN::Fractions) and even 1994 into nineteen ninety-four (Lingua::EN::Numbers::Years). What I actually _want_, though, is to turn In 1994, on the 22nd

Turning numbers into words

Guys, So, I know how to turn 36 into thirty-six (Lingua::EN::Numbers) and 22 into twenty-second (ditto), and 3/4 into three quarters (Lingua::EN::Fractions) and even 1994 into nineteen ninety-four (Lingua::EN::Numbers::Years). What I actually _want_, though, is to turn In 1994, on the 22nd

Re: stop shipping MYMETA to CPAN

David, Umm, surely a version of ExtUtils::MakeMaker that is recent enough to generate those files will also know to exclude them from 'make dist'. Likewise Module::Build. One would think. But mine appear to have shown up via a make manifest in EUMM a little over a year ago ... I definitely

Re: Dist::Zilla version handling

Matthew, Next project, I replaced the README with a symlink, got the Github page caching bug fixed it works fine, e.g. https://github.com/mca-wtsi/authen-daemon https://github.com/mca-wtsi/authen-daemon/blob/master/README.pod So your README.pod is a link to your lib/Authen/Daemon.pod;

Re: Help choosing a Module name

Jed, I noticed that many MooseX modules have Util in the third position but there doesn't seem to be a MooseX::Util branch of the namespace yet? I note you didn't get much response here. Have you tried over on the Moose mailing list? They're generally pretty helpful on questions such as

Re: Module naming and a couple other questions

Joshua, 2. It sounds like given the single function and it's relative uniqueness, there's no problem exporting it by default other than not being able to change it later. For the sake of forward compatibility, I'll probably just put it in @EXPORT_OK and require its explicit import. Bearing

Continued life of my GitPan fork

Guys, About eight months ago, I asked this list a question about how to start a new repo based on a GitPan fork.[1] The concensus was, just fork it and leave it as a fork, because there's no disadvantages to that. Well, I found a (mild) disadvantage. :-/ GitHub has a way to filter your repos:

Re: Starting a module's history from gitpan

Guys, On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 3:03 AM, Salvador Fandino sfand...@yahoo.com wrote: Forking from gitpan is a fine plan! Yep, that's what I ended up doing. Finally got the official release out there, after tracking down some problems in the test files that CPAN Testers was thoughtful enough to

Re: Starting a module's history from gitpan

David, Out of interest, did you try asking the original author whether he has a repo knocking around he'd be willing to share with you, so you can maintain history? I must admit, I did not. Primarily because I was trying to keep my message very short and not ask for much. From my Googling

Re: Variations on a theme

Paul, I notice while looking around CPAN that there are about 6 million Variations On A Theme By Bach^W^Wof Class::Accessor. Does anyone have anything of note to say on any of them? : : I _believe_ that everything you want to do could be done with Moose. While I've only recently started

Re: Parallel::Simple - bound args syntax

Ofer, In my case, it's much easier to pick off the first entry than the list. Why? my $opts = @_ ref $_[-1] eq 'HASH' ? pop : {}; my ($proj, @files) = @_; (from some code of mine; I have many functions defined like this) -- Buddy

Re: Introduction Letter

Ofer, With all due respect to Andrew, please remember that his is but one opinion. I've also now removed any traces of the run() synonym. You're right - why complicate things with no benefit. I didn't see anything wrong with the concept. Personally I would have done it the other way around

Potential Perl6::Exceptions?

Guys, Has anyone considered, or perhaps even started working on, a Perl 5 implementation of Perl 6's exceptions (at least at outlined in Apocalypse 4)? I'm sure not every aspect could be handled, but it seems to me that a module along the lines of Switch (and potentially using that as a