I'd also prefer *::Metadata but it is your call.
if you are not sure it is CAPAN style, you can always put it somewhere we can
have a little look at it.
Cheers, Nadim.
Hi,
> I'd also prefer *::Metadata but it is your call.
I'll wait whether Eric R. Meyers (WWW::YouTube) disagrees or not ..
and decide later on.
regards,
Robert
Hi,
thanks David and Jérôme for the reply!
>> I thought about: WWW::YouTube::Info (as it basically delivers info)
>
> That seems fine to me. I might have called it WWW::YouTube::Metadata,
> since "Info" is a bit generic, but it's really your call.
I'll stick to WWW::YouTube::Info, because:
*
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Robert Ginko wrote:
> * As I would like to make it available on CPAN:
> Where can I put this module in CPANs namespaces?
> I thought about: WWW::YouTube::Info (as it basically delivers info)
That seems fine to me. I might have called it WWW::YouTube::Metadata,
s
On 10/08/26 16:46 +0200, Robert Ginko wrote:
> I wrote a module (CPAN style, mostly, I hope .. ) that takes a YouTube
> VIDEO_ID and delivers certain info on the video: title, duration,
> author, URL to direct download, ..
>
> * As I would like to make it available on CPAN:
> Where can I put this
Ruslan N. Marchenko wrote:
Hi list,
For now it utilises root space FRA, however I understand that I need to
choose something more apropriate. I'm thinking on Net::Appliance::FRA or
Net::Appliance::Firewall...
I like Net::Appliance::*. Net::Appliance::FRA is nice and short -- but
for that
