Hi. I've written few libraries I'd like to release on CPAN and I'm looking
for some advice on how to name them.
I found this idea in Head First OOADhttp://headfirstlabs.com/books/hfooad/,
chapter 5. It's somewhat like a very simple version of Key-Value
Wow this has turned into a monster thread... ouch.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Shlomi Fish shlo...@shlomifish.org wrote:
Hi Sawyer,
Hey. :)
The problem is that using my $a and my $b will prevent the built-in $a and
$b
from being used and as a result is a bad idea. We should make sure
Hello Sawyer,
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 17:38:56 +0200
sawyer x xsawy...@gmail.com wrote:
Wow this has turned into a monster thread... ouch.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Shlomi Fish shlo...@shlomifish.org wrote:
The problem is that using my $a and my $b will prevent the built-in $a and
$b
Hi Trystan,
On Sun, 6 Nov 2011 16:28:03 -0600
Trystan trysta...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi. I've written few libraries I'd like to release on CPAN and I'm looking
for some advice on how to name them.
I found this idea in Head First OOADhttp://headfirstlabs.com/books/hfooad/,
chapter 5. It's
What about Object::KVC, Object::KVC::String, Object::KVC::List?
Trystan wrote:
I found this idea in Head First OOAD http://headfirstlabs.com/books/hfooad/,
chapter 5. It's somewhat like a very
simple version of Key-Value Coding
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Shlomi Fish shlo...@shlomifish.org wrote:
You shouldn't call lexical variables $a and $b:
That was a completely pointless comment, Shlomi.
He's trying to showcase an action on two objects that have the exact same
level of importance and relevance. Calling
What about Object::KVC, Object::KVC::String, Object::KVC::List?
KVC it is. I had actually been considering that.
In the Object::Generic documentation the author says his module should have
been in the Class:: namespace.
What is the difference between the Object:: namespace and Class::
* Trystan trysta...@gmail.com [2011-11-06 23:30]:
I found this idea in Head First
OOADhttp://headfirstlabs.com/books/hfooad/, chapter 5. It's
somewhat like a very simple version of Key-Value
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis pagalt...@gmx.dewrote:
* Trystan trysta...@gmail.com [2011-11-06 23:30]:
I found this idea in Head First
OOADhttp://headfirstlabs.com/books/hfooad/, chapter 5. It's
somewhat like a very simple version of Key-Value
Coding
-Original Message-
From: Shlomi Fish shlo...@shlomifish.org
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 19:42:35 +0200
To: sawyer x xsawy...@gmail.com
Cc: Perl Module Authors List module-authors@perl.org
Subject: Re: New module naming
Hi Sawyer,
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 13:36:58 +0200
sawyer x xsawy...@gmail.com
From: Eirik Berg Hanssen ebhans...@cpan.org
Reply-To: ebhans...@cpan.org
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 21:39:15 +0100
To: Bob Parker b...@perldevgeek.com
Cc: Shlomi Fish shlo...@shlomifish.org, Perl Module Authors List
module-authors@perl.org
Subject: Re: New module naming
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011
Uhm. So when would I ever use this over a simple hash?
Well I used it because the application I'm working on has a data model with
a lot of variation (I did this instead of creating a massive class
hierarchy). The accessors are the hash key scalar string. The 'equals' and
'contains' methods are
* sawyer x xsawy...@gmail.com [2011-11-07 12:40]:
* Shlomi Fish shlo...@shlomifish.org [2011-11-07 18:45]:
You shouldn't call lexical variables $a and $b:
That was a completely pointless comment, Shlomi.
Only in sending it to the list instead of as a private comment, and in
his way of
* Bob Parker b...@perldevgeek.com [2011-11-07 22:15]:
Perhaps you are a fan of the guy, perhaps not - I don't know you.
Perhaps it doesn’t even matter.
Perhaps you can be a decent person to someone you dislike.
What I do know is that for the past several years, I have seen what
should have
Clearly you are another fanboy of Shlomi's.
-Original Message-
From: Aristotle Pagaltzis pagalt...@gmx.de
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 23:46:02 +0100
To: Perl Module Authors List module-authors@perl.org
Subject: Taking another swing [was: New module naming]
* sawyer x xsawy...@gmail.com [2011
* Bob Parker b...@perldevgeek.com [2011-11-08 00:30]:
Clearly you are another fanboy of Shlomi's.
You found me out. I am two days short of proposing gay marriage to him.
* Aristotle Pagaltzis pagalt...@gmx.de [2011-11-07 23:50]:
* sawyer x xsawy...@gmail.com [2011-11-07 12:40]:
This is a
of the mailing list's time.
If you have anything further to say, you can say it privately.
-Original Message-
From: Aristotle Pagaltzis pagalt...@gmx.de
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 02:22:15 +0100
To: Perl Module Authors List module-authors@perl.org
Subject: Re: Taking another swing [was: New module naming
* Bob Parker b...@perldevgeek.com [2011-11-08 04:55]:
Aristotle you are, by your words and deeds in this thread, what was
known in my days in school as a bully. Apparently age and so-called
maturity has not changed that.
Hating Shlomi does not justify bullying him and painting me as the bully
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Bob Parker b...@perldevgeek.com wrote:
In this particular case, pretty much everyone clearly understood that what
was given was a GENERIC EXAMPLE, not real code. It didn't call for code
review, comment or criticism on the use of variables or their naming. What
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:36 PM, sawyer x xsawy...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a case where $a and $b makes absolute sense. It is also the same
case as Perl's sort() function that uses $a and $b to indicate two values
of the same importance.
... except declaring them as lexicals still
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Aristotle Pagaltzis pagalt...@gmx.de wrote:
...
In the real world people learn by copy-pasting code and tweaking until
it seems to do what they wanted. Every code example should be as close
to real working code as possible, ideally *should* be real working
Hi. I've written few libraries I'd like to release on CPAN and I'm looking
for some advice on how to name them.
I found this idea in Head First OOADhttp://headfirstlabs.com/books/hfooad/,
chapter 5. It's somewhat like a very simple version of Key-Value
22 matches
Mail list logo
