On Saturday 07 August 2010 15:56:28 Ovid wrote:
- Original Message
From: Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il
On Saturday 07 August 2010 00:44:05 Ovid wrote:
Laughing at that active_dev tag.
What's wrong with it?
First, my apologies for being so flippant. That was rude of
- Original Message
From: Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il
I can't tell you how many times I've supplied a complete patch, with tests
and documentation, for a known bug in a module and had absolutely no
response from the author. If I am willing to do all of that work for them
* Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il [2010-08-07 15:15]:
There's an easy solution to this problem - have this tag retire
after there hasn't been a new release in, say, 6 months. Or
maybe we can call it something else. (By retire I mean that
search engines, indexers, raters, etc. will ignore it,
Hi Aristotle,
On Sunday 08 August 2010 15:35:33 Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
* Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il [2010-08-07 15:15]:
There's an easy solution to this problem - have this tag retire
after there hasn't been a new release in, say, 6 months. Or
maybe we can call it something else.
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il wrote:
By all means active_dev is an indication that the author of the module
still has some idea
for enhancements (read - not bug fixes or internals cleanup) in the queue,
and
that you should expect more from him.
Maybe wip
On Saturday 07 August 2010 00:44:05 Ovid wrote:
Laughing at that active_dev tag.
What's wrong with it? Some modules are not actively developed, meaning that
they have reached API freeze or that the author is happy with them as they are
or they are considered deprecated and/or are in a
On Saturday 07 August 2010 04:50:29 Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
* Ovid publiustemp-moduleautho...@yahoo.com [2010-08-06 23:50]:
I can't say I've really been paying attention here, but while
some tags (requires C compiler) seem like they might be
reasonable, other tags such as black_magic
- Original Message
From: Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il
On Saturday 07 August 2010 00:44:05 Ovid wrote:
Laughing at that active_dev tag.
What's wrong with it?
First, my apologies for being so flippant. That was rude of me and I'm sorry. I
just typed what popped into my
On Saturday 07 August 2010 15:56:28 Ovid wrote:
- Original Message
From: Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il
On Saturday 07 August 2010 00:44:05 Ovid wrote:
Laughing at that active_dev tag.
What's wrong with it?
First, my apologies for being so flippant. That was rude of
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il wrote:
On Saturday 07 August 2010 04:50:29 Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
* Ovid publiustemp-moduleautho...@yahoo.com [2010-08-06 23:50]:
I can't say I've really been paying attention here, but while
some tags (requires C compiler)
Hi all!
Today I converted the Definitive Tags list to a POD-based spec. One can find
it inside a Mercurial repository here:
http://bitbucket.org/shlomif/rethinking-cpan/src/tip/CPAN-Definitive-
Tags/cpan-definitive-tags.pod
(Short URL: http://xrl.us/bhvcyb ).
Any comments would be welcome.
On 08/06/2010 10:58:02 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Hi all!
Today I converted the Definitive Tags list to a POD-based spec. One
can find
it inside a Mercurial repository here:
http://bitbucket.org/shlomif/rethinking-cpan/src/tip/CPAN-Definitive-
Tags/cpan-definitive-tags.pod
(Short URL:
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Geoffrey Leach ge...@hughes.net wrote:
On 08/06/2010 10:58:02 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Hi all!
Today I converted the Definitive Tags list to a POD-based spec. One
can find
it inside a Mercurial repository here:
Cc: rethinking-cpan rethinking-c...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Fri, 6 August, 2010 18:58:02
Subject: The CPAN Definitive Tags Spec
Hi all!
Today I converted the Definitive Tags list to a POD-based spec. One can find
it inside a Mercurial repository here:
http://bitbucket.org/shlomif
* Ovid publiustemp-moduleautho...@yahoo.com [2010-08-06 23:50]:
I can't say I've really been paying attention here, but while
some tags (requires C compiler) seem like they might be
reasonable, other tags such as black_magic seem highly
subjective. And the source_filter tag seems to belong in
15 matches
Mail list logo
