> On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 02:21:12 -0700, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> This already exists, it is the "passthrough" option to
Module::Build::Compat.
>small
>A small Makefile.PL will be created that passes all
>functional
Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 02:21:12 -0700, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL
>> PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > This already exists, it is the "passthrough" option to
> Module::Build::Compat.
>
> >small
> >A small Makefile.PL will be created that p
Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> Recently, on IRC (off the top of my head):
>
> : so can you explain why the compatibility layer is broken?
> : jeez, it is the *compatibility layer*
>
> I think it's time that Module::Build considers another compatibility
> layer in addition to the existing one. It woul
# from Andreas J. Koenig
# on Tuesday 11 September 2007 12:11 am:
>: so can you explain why the compatibility layer is broken?
>: jeez, it is the *compatibility layer*
>
>I think it's time that Module::Build considers another compatibility
>layer in addition to the existing one. It would be the on
Recently, on IRC (off the top of my head):
: so can you explain why the compatibility layer is broken?
: jeez, it is the *compatibility layer*
I think it's time that Module::Build considers another compatibility
layer in addition to the existing one. It would be the one for authors
who consider t
