# from David Golden
# on Tuesday 09 September 2008 16:00:
>This would be better if I finally updated CPAN::Reporter::Smoker to
>take an arbitrary list of distributions instead of just working
>backwards through CPAN and if you had a list of distributions with
>Build.PL.
Indeed I do have such a li
Hi Eric
> Yes, Module::Build needs better tests. It also needs somebody with the
> time to write them. (If Devel::Cover worked, I imagine it would tell
> me that the coverage is rather low.)
Is someone available for a (sort of) Perl micro-grant to write such
tests?
I could help fund it.
--
On this thread, Eric asked how to run a "scientific" style test.
Here's an idea based on CPAN Testers tools -- though not necessarily
CPAN Testers output.
a) Configure CPAN::Reporter to use the Test::Reporter::Transport::File
transport -- this will save reports into a directory
b) Run CPAN::Repo
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 02:27:09 -0700, Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> I have said it, I have (well, CPAN::Testers::ParseReport has)
>> downloaded 56000 reports from
>> http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/
> No, I meant what *testers*.
I could tell you but you could
# from Andreas J. Koenig
# on Tuesday 09 September 2008 00:09:
>OK, I walk you through them. First off, there are ten cases in the
>file I sent you.
>...
> So the above is a case where it's impossible to judge without
> looking at the report but at the same time we cannot have any
> expectation
