> On Sun, 7 Oct 2001 23:05:18 -0400, Brian Reichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> _Maybe_ it could be argued that this could live under the 'IPC'
> heirarchy. If the Powers-That-Be want to argue such a change into
> place, I guess I could go with that.
> But, this module has been avai
On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 12:15:38PM -0400, Kirrily Robert wrote:
> In perl.modules, you wrote:
> > modid: System2
> > rationale:
> >
> >this is an easier and 'cheaper' alternative to using open3 to
> >getting stderr as well as stdio from a child process.
>
> Is "system2" the common
In perl.modules, you wrote:
> modid: System2
> rationale:
>
>this is an easier and 'cheaper' alternative to using open3 to
>getting stderr as well as stdio from a child process.
Is "system2" the common Unix name for this feature? If so, I approve
the name. If, however, it's just
The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List:
modid: System2
DSLIP: bdpfb
description: like system(), but with STDERR available
userid: REICHERT (Brian Reichert)
chapterid: 23 (Miscellaneous_Modules)
communities:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], comp.la
The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List:
modid: system2
DSLIP: bdpfn
description: grab STDOUT, STDERR from an executed program
userid: REICHERT (Brian Reichert)
chapterid: 23 (Miscellaneous_Modules)
communities:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
s
