[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see
the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]]
In article , Theo Klepin
wrote:
> I am a little confused over which module list chapter selection to choose. I
> am writing a pure perl implimentation of the double metaphone algorithym an
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 07:24:11AM +0200, Andreas J Koenig wrote:
>
> That said, there is indeed a painful delay in the production of the
> modulelist. The software I have written to produce new module lists is
> very broken and I'd need a whole lot of consecutive days to redesign
> it so that the
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 09:09:45AM +0100, Steve Hay wrote:
> Does somebody need to click one of the links at the bottom of the
> "Module submission" mail for Win32::UTCFileTime:
>http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/modules/2003-05/msg00472.html
Exactly.
> If so, I'd appreciate somebody
Andreas J Koenig wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 16:55:44 +0100, Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 01:17:33PM +0100, Steve Hay wrote:
>> Is the Module List
>> (http://www.perl.com/CPAN/modules/00modlist.long.html) ever going to get
>> updated again, or has th
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 16:55:44 +0100, Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 01:17:33PM +0100, Steve Hay wrote:
>> Is the Module List
>> (http://www.perl.com/CPAN/modules/00modlist.long.html) ever going to get
>> updated again, or has that been abandoned now?
>>
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 01:17:33PM +0100, Steve Hay wrote:
> Is the Module List
> (http://www.perl.com/CPAN/modules/00modlist.long.html) ever going to get
> updated again, or has that been abandoned now?
>
> It is currently monstrously out-of-date (27 Aug 2002), which seems to
> prevent me from
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 09:25:36AM +0200, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
>
> > The "25) Bundles" chapter seems very incomplete. No Bundle::DBI for example.
>
> I'm not sure what to do about it. People do not seem to register
> bundles. OTOH, there are so many, that it's hard to pick a subset of
> im
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 00:36:17 +0200, Arthur Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi,
> Since currently the activity on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list seems very
> slow (I have several pending cases, some of which are non
> controversial (Hook::Scope for example), and since Elaine told me
