On Wednesday, Nov 6, 2002, at 05:39 Australia/Melbourne, Arthur Bergman
wrote:
DBI? :-) VCS is used outside CPAN, so is VFS, but I understand your
point.
FileSys:::Virtual is a more describing name of what it is.
Any other module maintainers care to make their voices heard?
Arthur
My codeve
On tisdag, nov 5, 2002, at 17:28 Europe/Stockholm, _brian_d_foy wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Arthur
Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Having reconsidered this, VFS matches the already existant VCS which
already exists.
If noone else has anything to add I will approve VFS:: in a cou
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Arthur Bergman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having reconsidered this, VFS matches the already existant VCS which
> already exists.
>
> If noone else has anything to add I will approve VFS:: in a couple of
> days.
well, i don't like VCS either. i've never see
Hi..
Having reconsidered this, VFS matches the already existant VCS which
already exists.
If noone else has anything to add I will approve VFS:: in a couple of
days.
I am looking forward to using this module :)
Arthur
On torsdag, okt 31, 2002, at 00:50 Europe/Stockholm, Scott Penrose
wro
On Wednesday, Oct 30, 2002, at 18:25 Australia/Melbourne, Arthur
Bergman wrote:
Hi,
This sounds like a really nice idea finally being implemented, however
I am unsure if it really needs a top level namespace and if not
Filesys::Virtual would be a better more describing name for people not
Hi,
This sounds like a really nice idea finally being implemented, however
I am unsure if it really needs a top level namespace and if not
Filesys::Virtual would be a better more describing name for people not
knowing what the concept of a VFS is.
Arthur
On tisdag, okt 29, 2002, at 02:47 E
