On Mar 14, 2007, at 10:43 PM, Souramita Sen wrote:
One small doubt. httpd version installed in my system is 2.2 and the latestversion of httpd-devel i got is also 2.2.But latest version of apr-devel(2.0) and apr-util-devel(0.9) are not in sync with corresponsing httpd version. Is there any compatibility issue here? Do I need to have a older version of apache server installed for that reason?
APR is versioned independently from httpd: httpd 2.0.x works with APR 0.9.x httpd 2.2.x works with APR 1.2.xThe version number for APR-Util is the same as for APR. When I compile httpd trunk, I use the trunk of APR and APR-Util.
Generally, if you work with RPMs you should look at which main packages (httpd, apr, apr-util) you have installed, and install the corresponding -devel packages with the same versions when you need the header files and the static libraries for development purposes.
Perhaps the Apache 2.x development RPM includes APR headers? Look for apr.h to see if this is the case. If I recall correctly, the Apache RPMs don't actually split out APR from httpd, which makes it harder to install Subversion on a Red Hat machine.
We at apache.org do not have a clear view of what goes into vendors' RPMs or packages. You are probably better off staying with the RPM packages your vendor offers rather than just rounding something up on rpmfind.
In any case, if you're doing module development, you might consider building your own httpd so you have finer control over what it contains (like CFLAGS="-O0 -DDEBUG" so your module as well as the server are built with debug symbols).
S. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.temme.net/sander/ PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
