Re: mod_proxy per-directory settings handling

2010-06-15 Thread mike venzke
0 09:07:36 > To: > Reply-To: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: mod_proxy per-directory settings handling > > > Am I wrong? Is there some other reason why mod_proxy needs to go through > the > > aliases in forward order, maybe related to regex matching? > > Just co

Re: mod_proxy per-directory settings handling

2010-06-15 Thread mike
ckBerry from SingTel! -Original Message- From: Eric Covener Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:07:36 To: Reply-To: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: mod_proxy per-directory settings handling > Am I wrong? Is there some other reason why mod_proxy needs to go through the > aliases in forwa

Re: mod_proxy per-directory settings handling

2010-06-15 Thread Eric Covener
> Am I wrong? Is there some other reason why mod_proxy needs to go through the > aliases in forward order, maybe related to regex matching? Just convention that the first match is the operative one (which is also why the "!" rules have to come before whatever would match them). Could make it conf

mod_proxy per-directory settings handling

2010-06-15 Thread mike venzke
We've been trying to reconcile various issues in config file Location inheritance in httpd 2.2. In reading the core code, we've determined that Locations truly are read and merged in order, and the most-specific (longest Location strings) should go last. Therefore, we order our Locations in increas