On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:37:39 -0800
Brian McQueen wrote:
> What I was imaging is all requests going through that same queue and
> some daemon works the queue all the time. The httpd is one interface
> to the queue. So there is no such hook required. Just start up the
> queue drainer and start th
On 29/12/2010 10:52, Mike Meyer wrote:
>
> The current code actually works fine - except for this timing
> issue. If I kill apache in the middle of handling a reversal, and
> restart it, the first connection will cause the unfinished reversal to
> be finished. I'm trying to find some way to make th
On 12/29/2010 7:07 AM, Mike Meyer wrote:
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:00:09 +0200
Issac Goldstand wrote:
On 29/12/2010 10:52, Mike Meyer wrote:
The current code actually works fine - except for this timing
issue. If I kill apache in the middle of handling a reversal, and
restart it, the first con
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 08:27:33 -0500
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>
>
> On 12/29/2010 7:07 AM, Mike Meyer wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:00:09 +0200
> > Issac Goldstand wrote:
> >
> >> On 29/12/2010 10:52, Mike Meyer wrote:
> >>> The current code actually works fine - except for this timing
> >>> iss
I do think that the httpd may be un-needed except as a proxy. You know
about Apache's Active MQ and other such queues? They have a protocol
(not http) which is designed for reliable messaging. Maybe its jms or
stomp? There might even be a module designed to proxy to active mq.
On 12/29/10, M
