Re: using mod_proxy for subrequests

2011-05-04 Thread rm
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 02:00:33PM +0200, Sorin Manolache wrote: I didn't mean that I'm really clueless. I trawled through the apache sources quite extensively and I decided to do it. And there's a commercial/financial stake in my case too. If you look at mod_proxy's sources, there're 4

Re: mod_gnutls and mod_proxy (TLS termination)

2011-05-04 Thread Hardy Griech
On 03.05.2011 21:48, Ben Noordhuis wrote: : Hardy, when and where are you registering your optional functions? mod_proxy looks them up in the post_config phase so they must have been registered by then. register_hooks is a good place for it. : Sorry, my fault. I focused on ssl_proxy_enable()

Re: mod_gnutls and mod_proxy (TLS termination)

2011-05-04 Thread Ben Noordhuis
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 17:50, Hardy Griech nt...@mardys.de wrote: Sorry, my fault.  I focused on ssl_proxy_enable() which is not called in my case.  ssl_engine_disable() does the job. So my problem is hopefully solved. Disadvantage of this solution is, that mod_ssl and mod_gnutls cannot be