I'm relatively new to module development, but I have a need to wrap a
function in a proprietary module (no source) registered via a
check_user_id hook in a proprietary module (mod_auth_saf). Basically, I
need to detect an expired password condition. I've already tried to use
the normal pre/post
Given what I learned writing my module, that would certainly work. I
think you'd be hooking check_user_id with the very first call that
happens in that phase. That said, I don't know if there might be a
better way to handle this...
Thanks,
Rick Houser
Auto-Owners Insurance
Systems Support
part #2 sounds more like the kind of a task you would want to use at
least an external process, if not a separate physical machine for.
Basically, you are looking for an intelligent load balancer, correct?
Thanks,
Rick Houser
Auto-Owners Insurance
Systems Support
(517)703-2580
-Original
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sam
Carleton
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 11:23 AM
To: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Setting a handler within a configuration directive
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Houser, Rick [EMAIL
then maybe the limit
wouldn't be affected a redirect? That gets a little off-topic.
Thanx,
-Tony
---
Manager, IT Operations
Format Dynamics, Inc.
303-573-1800x27
abia...@formatdynamics.com
http://www.formatdynamics.com
-Original Message-
From: Houser, Rick
, Inc.
303-573-1800x27
abia...@formatdynamics.com
http://www.formatdynamics.com
-Original Message-
From: Houser, Rick [mailto:houser.r...@aoins.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 2:24 PM
To: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: cache POST requests
Is this a little clearer? Notice
Is this the only child process, or do you have 3+?
Thanks,
Rick Houser
Auto-Owners Insurance
Systems Support
(517)703-2580
-Original Message-
From: Anthony J. Biacco [mailto:abia...@formatdynamics.com]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 6:12 PM
To: us...@httpd.apache.org
Cc:
Sounds like a badly broken application to me. If the data is truly
cacheable, the application shouldn't be taking explicit steps to try to
prevent just that. Depending on what the backend system is, you might
be better off using some kind of a filter to just remove that killCache
parameter in
Is there a reason you can't just change your rewrite rule to a [R=301]?
Thanks,
Rick Houser
Auto-Owners Insurance
Systems Support
(517)703-2580
-Original Message-
From: Anthony J. Biacco [mailto:abia...@formatdynamics.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 4:53 PM
To:
Folks I've talked to just don't try to get htaccess to work with ajax for the
most part. They rely on php security.
That's probably because on the backend, they still need to handle
authorization. Unless all users to your backend should have equal access to
all associated data, you're
: Houser, Rick [mailto:houser.r...@aoins.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 1:49 PM
To: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: Location of Apache Modules
Folks I've talked to just don't try to get htaccess to work with
ajax
for the most part. They rely on php security.
That's
Not entirely. You could also either use a wildcard certificate
(although IE doesn't support dots in the wildcard portion) or
exclusively support the vhosts on modern browsers running TLS.
Thanks,
Rick Houser
Auto-Owners Insurance
Systems Support
(517)703-2580
I'm facing a situation where we may be required to handle multi-megabyte
POST submissions from dial-up users. We want to avoid tying up the
backend servers for long periods of time if possible. Does anyone know
of either built-in support for pre-buffering complete POST request
bodies (i.e. avoid
@httpd.apache.org
Cc: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: POST Body Buffer?
Are your multi-megabyte submissions going to use multipart/form-data
encoding? If so, ModSecurity does exactly what you need when you enable
request body buffering.
Ivan
On 19 Jun 2009, at 21:01, Houser, Rick
I'm newbie in APR ... the same in mod_rewrite with flag [P].
If the mod_rewrite does what you need, you should use that rather than
re-writing an alternate version on your own.
Thanks,
Rick Houser
Auto-Owners Insurance
Systems Support
(517)703-2580
-Original Message-
From: ricardo13
You realize that you could trivially handle most related issues without
changing Apache at all just by prioritizing your backend work, right?
For example, put your higher priority work in a faster server process
than the low priority work.
If your applications are written according to best
I don't understand why standard mod_deflate functionality won't work.
If you violate the specs and muck with content-length, it's not going to
work right in a browser, anyhow.
Thanks,
Rick Houser
Auto-Owners Insurance
Systems Support
(517)703-2580
-Original Message-
From: Anthony J.
I'm not familiar with the CDN acronym. I could be mistaken, but I'm
fairly certain that HTTP 1.1 required support for chunked transfer
(which implies Content-Length would NOT be required for anything HTTP
1.1 compliant). Additionally, I thought the content-length referenced
the contents of the
There's a hook for processing your configuration and making any changes
(offhand, post-config?). If any of this is done on a file or directory
level, you can do that in your configuration merge callbacks. I have to
do something similar where a forwarding capability might be enabled, but
the
However, I would suggest that connections are better dropped at
IP-level (by firewall rules/iptables) or by using
I agree for blocking access, however a module that was to add something
like a per-IP connection-rate or simultaneous connection limit could be
a nice gem for the toolbox, too :).
This is a known issue in IBM's 2.0.47 port of Apache (IHS), which was
fixed in a later upstream version (possibly by the 2.2.8 port, but I
really can't say for sure). It would take a lot of digging for me to
locate the specific version, so I'm going to pass on that one. At least
in my case, this
21 matches
Mail list logo
