2009/1/22 vince lapcc...@gmail.com:
in short
for the apache conf
WSGIScriptAlias / /var/www/devel/testwsgi.py
http://localhost/abc/def
would become GET /abc/def inside testwsgi.py
and with
WSGIScriptAlias /test /var/www/devel/testwsgi.py
http://localhost/test/abc/def
would become
2009/1/21 gert gert.cuyk...@gmail.com:
The John Machin decode('latin1') solution from comp.lang.python
Yes, was what I was going to suggest, but more complicated than that.
Because you have now read the whole of wsgi.input into memory, memory
usage can blow out now for large file uploads.
Is there anyone out there using mod_wsgi on WebFaction?
If you are, what version of mod_wsgi are they using?
I have seen a post elsewhere that suggests the option they provide is
for mod_wsgi 2.0. If this is the case they aren't providing important
fixes to wsgi.file_wrapper which would be
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Is there anyone out there using mod_wsgi on WebFaction?
If you are, what version of mod_wsgi are they using?
I have seen a post elsewhere that suggests the option they provide is
for mod_wsgi 2.0. If this is the case they aren't providing important
fixes to
2009/1/22 MilesTogoe miles.to...@gmail.com:
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Is there anyone out there using mod_wsgi on WebFaction?
If you are, what version of mod_wsgi are they using?
I have seen a post elsewhere that suggests the option they provide is
for mod_wsgi 2.0. If this is the case they
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Graham Dumpleton
graham.dumple...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/1/21 gert gert.cuyk...@gmail.com:
The John Machin decode('latin1') solution from comp.lang.python
Yes, was what I was going to suggest, but more complicated than that.
Because you have now read the
