[modwsgi] Re: Donations

2008/8/25 mrts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Graham, let me first thank you for mod_wsgi. It is just excellent. > > I really would like to arrange some donations to thank you for > mod_wsgi development (unfortunately nothing grand, but perhaps others > will follow the lead... ping, Google?). However, i

[modwsgi] Re: Versions 1.5 and 2.2 of mod_wsgi now available.

I can also say my experience as a modwsgi newbie did take a bit of work to get up and running. Nonetheless I understand that the more technical documentation is more important and needs to come first. As users of modwsgi with varied skills we could contribute this component of the project

[modwsgi] Cookie-based authentication

First, let me say that AuthBasicProvider wsgi WSGIAuthUserScript /usr/local/wsgi/scripts/auth.wsgi works well for me with Django (there were some issues reported in another thread). But having access only to a limited environment, user and password is quite restrictive. Under mod_python, the f

[modwsgi] Donations

Graham, let me first thank you for mod_wsgi. It is just excellent. I really would like to arrange some donations to thank you for mod_wsgi development (unfortunately nothing grand, but perhaps others will follow the lead... ping, Google?). However, it's problematic as I'm in Europe and I need an

[modwsgi] Re: Versions 1.5 and 2.2 of mod_wsgi now available.

On Aug 24, 8:25 am, "Graham Dumpleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll acknowledge that more simplified path into documentation is > needed. Initially wasn't done that way as specifically wanted to scare > away the newbies so could get more knowledgeable people on board to > help sort out all th

[modwsgi] Re: mod_wsgi 2.2 seems to be breaking CGI

mod_cgi ___ Douglas William Thrift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Original Message - From: "Graham Dumpleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 3:57 AM Subject: [modwsgi] Re:

[modwsgi] Re: Versions 1.5 and 2.2 of mod_wsgi now available.

Forgot to say: this line in the wiki home page needs to be updated: "The most up to date and recommended version of mod_wsgi is 2.1." Regards, Clodoaldo Pinto Neto 2008/8/24 Clodoaldo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/8/24 Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> I'll acknowledge that more simplif

[modwsgi] Re: Versions 1.5 and 2.2 of mod_wsgi now available.

2008/8/24 Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I'll acknowledge that more simplified path into documentation is > needed. Initially wasn't done that way as specifically wanted to scare > away the newbies so could get more knowledgeable people on board to > help sort out all the issues. :-) >

[modwsgi] Re: new thread in WSGIImportScript

On 24-08-2008, Graham Dumpleton wrote: > > 2008/8/24 William Dode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> Hi, >> >> Is it a good idea to start a maintenance thread with WSGIImportScript. > > There is nothing wrong with doing that. You may want to have a look at: > > http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/wiki/Relo

[modwsgi] Re: Apache Authentication Provider

Going back through these posts, one question below. 2008/8/14 Milan Andric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Working off the wiki link on AccessControlMechanisms I was able to get > the authentication working on it's own but the authentication breaks > when I add the WSGIScriptAlias directive. The applic

[modwsgi] Re: Version 2.3 of mod_wsgi now available.

Damn, forgot to update the internal version mod_wsgi version numbers again. At least I remember the version string this time. :-) Graham 2008/8/23 Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This quick turn around version is to fix problem with 2.2 which caused > CGI scripts to fail. See: > > http: