[modwsgi] Re: Improving the mod_wsgi documentation.

2008-08-27 Thread Graham Dumpleton
2008/8/27 Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > As part of the process of improving wiki documentation for mod_wsgi, > which everyone is encouraging me to do, I have extracted and trimmed > slightly the build and installation notes from the README in the > source code and stuck them in a wiki do

[modwsgi] Re: Apache Authentication Provider

2008-08-27 Thread Milan Andric
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2008/8/28 Milan Andric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >> >> On Aug 24, 5:21 am, "Graham Dumpleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> Going back through these posts, one question below. >>> >>> 2008/8/14 Milan Andric <[EMA

[modwsgi] Re: WSGIProcessGroup and logs

2008-08-27 Thread Graham Dumpleton
2008/8/27 Garito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Thanks Graham, I'm going to upgrade today > > About the main configuration: what a shame I couldn't config all the > site in the .htaccess > > If I will can I can use cheap hosting only having mod_wsgi activated > but doesn't matter, this is how it works!

[modwsgi] Re: Apache Authentication Provider

2008-08-27 Thread Graham Dumpleton
2008/8/28 Milan Andric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > On Aug 24, 5:21 am, "Graham Dumpleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> Going back through these posts, one question below. >> >> 2008/8/14 Milan Andric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >> >> > Working off the wiki link on AccessControlMechanisms I was

[modwsgi] Re: Windows binaries of mod_wsgi.

2008-08-27 Thread Graham Dumpleton
Thanks. Have included that change for future. Graham 2008/8/28 Adal Chiriliuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hello, > > Sorry for the delay, I have checked from time to time the newsgroup > and noticed 2.1 and 2.2 coming out, but I quickly forgot about them :| > Thanks for reminding me ;) > > I have c

[modwsgi] Re: Windows binaries of mod_wsgi.

2008-08-27 Thread Adal Chiriliuc
I forgot to tell that I've also tested a little the Python 2.5/Apache 2.2 version and it worked ok. On 28 Aug, 00:24, Adal Chiriliuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > Sorry for the delay, I have checked from time to time the newsgroup > and noticed 2.1 and 2.2 coming out, but I quickly forg

[modwsgi] Re: Windows binaries of mod_wsgi.

2008-08-27 Thread Adal Chiriliuc
Hello, Sorry for the delay, I have checked from time to time the newsgroup and noticed 2.1 and 2.2 coming out, but I quickly forgot about them :| Thanks for reminding me ;) I have compiled and uploaded a new Windows version: http://adal.chiriliuc.com/mod_wsgi/revision_1018_2.3/ A small change w

[modwsgi] Re: Apache Authentication Provider

2008-08-27 Thread Milan Andric
On Aug 24, 5:21 am, "Graham Dumpleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Going back through these posts, one question below. > > 2008/8/14 Milan Andric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Working off the wiki link on AccessControlMechanisms I was able to get > > the authentication working on it's own but

[modwsgi] Re: Improving the mod_wsgi documentation.

2008-08-27 Thread Clodoaldo
2008/8/27 Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > As part of the process of improving wiki documentation for mod_wsgi, > which everyone is encouraging me to do, I have extracted and trimmed > slightly the build and installation notes from the README in the > source code and stuck them in a wiki

[modwsgi] Re: Improving the mod_wsgi documentation.

2008-08-27 Thread Nimrod A. Abing
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:52 PM, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As part of the process of improving wiki documentation for mod_wsgi, > which everyone is encouraging me to do, I have extracted and trimmed > slightly the build and installation notes from the README in the > source c

[modwsgi] Improving the mod_wsgi documentation.

2008-08-27 Thread Graham Dumpleton
As part of the process of improving wiki documentation for mod_wsgi, which everyone is encouraging me to do, I have extracted and trimmed slightly the build and installation notes from the README in the source code and stuck them in a wiki document. If interested parties could read it and provide