2009/4/17 Johny :
>
> Dear Graham,
> Thanks for the reply.I installed mod_wsgi with MPM worker and it
> works now.But I could not see the differences, regarding memory using,
> when MPM worker is used in comparison with MPM prefork.Must I change
> mod_wsgi setting anyhow? I use daemon mode with
> I'm
> going to try your suggestion (single threaded, multiprocess) and see
> what happens.
>
Remember process are expensive, so start with a low number and increase as
needed.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog
Dear Graham,
Thanks for the reply.I installed mod_wsgi with MPM worker and it
works now.But I could not see the differences, regarding memory using,
when MPM worker is used in comparison with MPM prefork.Must I change
mod_wsgi setting anyhow? I use daemon mode with processes=3 threads=1
Thank yo
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Ariel Mauricio Nunez Gomez
wrote:
> Bah, I didn't realize it was an old thread, the OP must have solved his
> issue by now.
Interesting. Yes, we are using GeoDjango. I haven't solved the issue,
but haven't had much time to troubleshoot lately and get back. I'm
go
If still no joy, can you replace the 'configure' script for mod_wsgi with:
http://modwsgi.googlecode.com/svn/branches/mod_wsgi-2.X/configure
This addresses a problem with MacPorts Python 2.6, but maybe the
problem actually lies more with Python 2.6 itself rather than the
MacPorts version. For
When you say 'Also, I get no errors if I remove the maximum-requests',
is that on all configurations?
When you run your tests, are requests always sequential? Ie., no
concurrent requests.
Does it make a difference if you specify:
WSGIApplicationGroup %{GLOBAL}
Finally, what other third party
2009/4/16 frank h. :
>
> Graham,
> thanks for your help, here comes the output
>
> $ grep LD Makefile
> LDFLAGS = -F/Library/Frameworks -framework Python -u _PyMac_Error -
> arch ppc
> LDLIBS = -ldl
> $(APXS) -c $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) mod_wsgi.c $(LDFLAGS) $(LDLIBS)
>
> $ otool -L /opt/a
The urls that not working aren't using anything except the plain
django 1.0.2. (No GeoDjango). So it could be django. How would
increasing the max requests make it more thread-safe?
On Apr 15, 4:03 pm, Ariel Mauricio Nunez Gomez
wrote:
> Bah, I didn't realize it was an old thread, the OP must ha
2009/4/16 Chunlin Zhang :
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Graham Dumpleton
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Daemon mode is not available on Windows. Just drop the
>> WSGIDaemonProcess and WSGIProcessGroup directives.
>
> Will it be supported in the future?
No. Windows doesn't support fork() and how mod_ws
Graham,
thanks for your help, here comes the output
$ grep LD Makefile
LDFLAGS = -F/Library/Frameworks -framework Python -u _PyMac_Error -
arch ppc
LDLIBS = -ldl
$(APXS) -c $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) mod_wsgi.c $(LDFLAGS) $(LDLIBS)
$ otool -L /opt/apache2/modules/mod_wsgi.so
/opt/apache2/
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Graham Dumpleton
wrote:
>
>
> Daemon mode is not available on Windows. Just drop the
> WSGIDaemonProcess and WSGIProcessGroup directives.
Will it be supported in the future?
>
> Graham
>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Chunlin Zhang
>> wrote
2009/4/16 Johny :
>
>
> Graham,
> Thank you for your reply.
> So I tried to rebuild the mod_wsgi but it finds the old Apache
> ( prefork version) 2.0.59
>
> root@ /mod_wsgi-2.4# ./configure
> checking for apxs2... no
> checking for apxs... /usr/sbin/apxs
> checking Apache version... 2.0.59
> check
Graham,
Thank you for your reply.
So I tried to rebuild the mod_wsgi but it finds the old Apache
( prefork version) 2.0.59
root@ /mod_wsgi-2.4# ./configure
checking for apxs2... no
checking for apxs... /usr/sbin/apxs
checking Apache version... 2.0.59
checking for python... /usr/bin/python
config
Can you also post what the values of LDFLAGS and LDLIBS in the
generated Makefile in mod_wsgi source directory are after having run
configure.
Graham
2009/4/16 Graham Dumpleton :
> What do you get when you run:
>
> otool -L mod_wsgi.so
>
> Graham
>
> 2009/4/16 frank h. :
>>
>> Hi
>> I am trying
2009/4/16 Johny :
>
> I have installed Apache/2.0.59 with MPM prefork with mod_wsgi and
> it works.
>
> But I wanted to installed MPM worker so I compiled and installed
> Apache/2.0.63 with MPM worker to a different directory but have not
> installed again mod_wsgi .Instead I copied the instal
I have installed Apache/2.0.59 with MPM prefork with mod_wsgi and
it works.
But I wanted to installed MPM worker so I compiled and installed
Apache/2.0.63 with MPM worker to a different directory but have not
installed again mod_wsgi .Instead I copied the installed mod_wsgi to
the modules di
What do you get when you run:
otool -L mod_wsgi.so
Graham
2009/4/16 frank h. :
>
> Hi
> I am trying to install mod_wsgi 2.4 on my PPC Mac OS X 10.4 Server
> machine.
> There is an apache2 living under /opt, furnished by Apple
>
> since Apache is
> $ file /opt/apache2/bin/httpd
> /opt/apache2/
2009/4/16 Chunlin Zhang :
>
> Another issue:
> After I add "WSGIDaemonProcess moin user=someuser group=somegroup
> home=/home/someuser processes=5 threads=10 maximum-requests=1000
> umask=0007" to my http.conf,I could not start the apache service,got
> the err message:"The Apache service named re
Hi
I am trying to install mod_wsgi 2.4 on my PPC Mac OS X 10.4 Server
machine.
There is an apache2 living under /opt, furnished by Apple
since Apache is
$ file /opt/apache2/bin/httpd
/opt/apache2/bin/httpd: Mach-O executable ppc
I compiled my own Python 2.6.2 like this:
curl -O http://python.or
Another issue:
After I add "WSGIDaemonProcess moin user=someuser group=somegroup
home=/home/someuser processes=5 threads=10 maximum-requests=1000
umask=0007" to my http.conf,I could not start the apache service,got
the err message:"The Apache service named reported the following
error:
>>> Invali
> So, try the 'run/wsgi' value first, with no leading slash.
I am running on a RedHat flavored distro, so:
WSGISocketPrefix run/wsgi
worked 100%.
Thank you again.
-Alen
On Apr 16, 10:25 am, Graham Dumpleton
wrote:
> 2009/4/16 Alen Ribic :
>
>
>
> > Ok that fixed the socket connection perm
2009/4/16 Alen Ribic :
>
> Ok that fixed the socket connection permission issue.
> I confirm that all is working now.
>
> The WSGISocketPrefix directive worked.
>
> I just set mine to:
>
> WSGISocketPrefix /tmp/wsgi
Preferably do not put it in /tmp, especially if this is a shared
system. Part of
Ok that fixed the socket connection permission issue.
I confirm that all is working now.
The WSGISocketPrefix directive worked.
I just set mine to:
WSGISocketPrefix /tmp/wsgi
No mo permission issues as /tmp on my server is readable and writeable
by all users.
Thank you very much for all your
2009/4/16 Alen Ribic :
>
>> What you probably want is:
>>
>> WSGIDaemonProcess mysite user=intrack group=intrack
>> python-path=/home/intrack/intrack_pythonenv/lib/python2.5/site-packages
>> processes=2 threads=25
>>
>> WSGIProcessGroup mysite
>>
>> WSGIScriptAlias / /var/www/wsgi_scripts/In
> What you probably want is:
>
> WSGIDaemonProcess mysite user=intrack group=intrack
> python-path=/home/intrack/intrack_pythonenv/lib/python2.5/site-packages
> processes=2 threads=25
>
> WSGIProcessGroup mysite
>
> WSGIScriptAlias / /var/www/wsgi_scripts/InTrack.wsgi
>
Thank you kindly, th
25 matches
Mail list logo
