On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 1:42 AM, Graham Dumpleton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the moment mod_wsgi will coexist with mod_python in same Apache
installation. This is done at some cost though because of mod_python
being broken in various ways. Specifically, the following issues exist
when both
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Graham Dumpleton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Except that recent Python 3.0 betas/release candidates broke sub
interpreter support
Is that registered as a blocker yet?
Cheers,
Dirkjan
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 7:14 AM, Graham Dumpleton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is why I see the fork of setuptools being interesting. That is,
someone else has got frustrated enough with something else produced by
the same author to get to that point. Unfortunately, one can't really
fork
Heh, I just made this info.wsgi up yesterday:
def application(env, respond):
respond('200 OK', [('Content-Type', 'text/plain')])
for k, v in sorted(env.iteritems()):
yield '%s: %r\n' % (k, v)
I've wanted this before, and since I always used to keep an info.php
lying around, as
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Graham Dumpleton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How many processes/threads is application running under and is that
embedded mode or daemon mode?
Embedded mode: WSGIScriptAlias / /home/djc/src/ska/ska.wsgi
Cheers,
Dirkjan
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Graham Dumpleton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apache prefork or worker MPM. How many processes/threads for MPM, or
are using Apache defaults.
Should be prefork, with these values:
StartServers5
MinSpareServers 5
MaxSpareServers 10
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 2:00 AM, Graham Dumpleton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I already have to tread gingerly around people involved with a number
of different Python projects because I took issue with their software
and they didn't like it. Some others just prefer their religion and
regard it
